Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea likely to test fusion-boosted fission bomb able to reach U.S.
Asahi Shimbun ^ | January 25, 2013 | YOSHIHIRO MAKINO

Posted on 01/29/2013 2:15:42 PM PST by Strategerist

North Korea's next nuclear test could enable it to use a smaller, more sophisticated bomb mounted on a long-range ballistic missile to strike the U.S. mainland, Japanese government sources said.

Pyongyang will likely experiment with a fusion-boosted fission bomb in a "high-level" nuclear test it said would target the United States, according to the sources.

A fusion-boosted fission bomb induces nuclear fusion with slight nuclear fission, enabling more efficient nuclear fission. A fusion-boosted fission bomb can therefore be made about one-fourth the size of an ordinary nuclear bomb.

Either uranium or plutonium can be used to develop the bomb.

North Korea said Jan. 24 it will carry out a third nuclear test in opposition to a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning the launch of a long-range ballistic missile--that Pyongyang claimed to be a satellite--in December.

In a statement, the country's National Defense Commission said the "high-level" nuclear test, as well as the long-range rockets North Korea plans to fire, will be targeted at the United States, which it declares its enemy.

The Japanese government has concluded that North Korea is ready to test a fusion-boosted fission bomb, and sources said Pyongyang will be able to put it to practical use after a single test.

Japan has been monitoring North Korea's nuclear development program with the United States and other countries. It has analyzed nuclear-related materials North Korea has imported and nuclear-related facilities it has constructed or developed.

While North Korea's first nuclear test in 2006 resulted in an explosion equivalent to less than 1 kiloton of trinitrotoluene (TNT), the second test in 2009 generated an explosion of several kilotons.

In May 2010, North Korea also announced it had succeeded in achieving nuclear fusion.

According to Akihiro Kuroki, a managing director at the Institute of Energy Economics, Japan, a fusion-boosted fission bomb uses substantially smaller amounts of explosives and buffer materials than an ordinary nuclear bomb.

North Korea is believed to possess an atomic bomb similar to the one dropped on Nagasaki on Aug. 9, 1945, which weighed about five tons.

A successful test of a fusion-boosted fission bomb is expected to enable the reclusive communist country to reduce it to a little more than 1 ton.

North Korea is also developing an improved version of the Taepodong-2 long-range ballistic missile, which will be able to carry a nuclear bomb of between 800 kilograms and 1 ton.

North Korea is believed to have studied other countries' development of fusion-boosted fission bombs.

The United States first succeeded in testing an ordinary nuclear bomb in 1945 and is said to have developed a fusion-boosted fission bomb in 1956.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: northkorea; nuclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Probably more useful to discuss real explosions about to happen instead of fake ones that didn't happen.

Keep in mind this was probably translated from Japanese, and could be written better; it's NOT saying the next North Korean nuclear test will be an actual warhead on a missile, just that the test could further their efforts towards having a warhead on a missile.

To be clear what is being discussed in the article is not what you think of in terms of a "hydrogen" bomb - it would not be a multi-megaton thermonuclear bomb, but a bomb where a small amount of fusion is used to enhance the efficiency and yield of a traditional fusion bomb. It would allow for further warhead miniaturization.

1 posted on 01/29/2013 2:15:47 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Is the white house throwing a party?


2 posted on 01/29/2013 2:17:51 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
It would allow for further warhead miniaturization.

Yeah...like for an EMP???

3 posted on 01/29/2013 2:27:56 PM PST by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

edit...”enhance the yield of a traditional fission bomb.”


4 posted on 01/29/2013 2:28:21 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t know if the White House is throwing a party, but the Missile Defense Agency probably is.


5 posted on 01/29/2013 2:29:27 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

I think I have a better shot at building the Perpetual Motion Machine in my back yard than the NorKorComs have of solving nuclear fusion.


6 posted on 01/29/2013 2:30:31 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Thank you Hillary for another glaring failure.


7 posted on 01/29/2013 2:31:17 PM PST by willardwx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Strategerist

9 posted on 01/29/2013 2:37:09 PM PST by Diogenesis (Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Did Red China give North Korea the missile portable bomb designs which were sold to it by Bill Clinton?
10 posted on 01/29/2013 2:39:43 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Forget about Republicans for a moment, does anybody think John Kennedy or FDR would have tolerated this **** for two seconds??


11 posted on 01/29/2013 2:42:47 PM PST by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The tale of what Bill Clinton “sold” to the Chinese keeps growing in the telling.

We didn’t sell the Chinese nuclear bomb designs.


12 posted on 01/29/2013 2:45:12 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

This wouldn’t be the development of a full-scale multi-stage thermonuclear weapon; it’s a slight modification to an implosion fission device (which the NORKs already have) basically putting some fusionable material in the middle of the imploding Pu or HEU to generate more neutrons and improve the fission explosion.


13 posted on 01/29/2013 2:46:54 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: willardwx
Thank you Hillary for another glaring failure.

So when i was in Grad school 4 years ago, this mid-level Obama foreign policy functionary came to give a lecture talking about how their policy of "engagement" would be so much better than the obviously stupid Bush policies that failed to stop the DPRK nuke program.

14 posted on 01/29/2013 2:48:39 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

The Clintons transferred all pending US
patent applications to the red Chinese for political cash.

How do you know what was in there? or in the rest?


15 posted on 01/29/2013 2:49:26 PM PST by Diogenesis (Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

OK. I’m not into nuclear science, don’t have the brains for it. So, what would be the range of this missile, as far as we know, and what would the impact of the detonation be? As far as we know.


16 posted on 01/29/2013 2:52:54 PM PST by ArmyTeach ( Videteco eos prius (See 'em first) Sculpin 191)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Not fusion they are doing. No way they have figured that out.

The trick is injection tritium into the hollow pit of a fission device just before detonation. The intense fission reaction is sufficient to start fusion of the tritium and radically increase the yield both from added fusion energy and releasing a lot more neutrons further increasing the fission yield.

Pretty sure without looking that we figured how to do this before we figured out thermonukes.

17 posted on 01/29/2013 2:53:45 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
We didn’t sell the Chinese nuclear bomb designs.

IIRC, didn't the Chinese they have their man inside Los Alamos stealing the designs for the W88 and such miniaturized devices?

I recall lots of hand waving about what he did or did not steal. Sounded like a smoke screen to me.

18 posted on 01/29/2013 2:59:52 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
"The United States first succeeded in testing an ordinary nuclear bomb in 1945 and is said to have developed a fusion-boosted fission bomb in 1956."

Boosted fission bombs were developed well before the staged thermonuclear weapons. Boosted fission bombs were what the Eniwetok tests were about in 1950 or 51.

"The intense fission reaction is sufficient to start fusion of the tritium and radically increase the yield both from added fusion energy and releasing a lot more neutrons further increasing the fission yield."

I believe that this is also the physical basis underlying the practice of the "keg stand" as well.

19 posted on 01/29/2013 3:01:13 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Panic in Year Zero: Crazy Kick
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MBzkGEl0LI


20 posted on 01/29/2013 3:05:07 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson