Replies

To: dblshot

Wouldn't an explosion that size be picked up by seismic earthquake sensors?

Yes. Since it wasn't, it means there wasn't an explosion.

15 posted on 01/29/2013 1:47:47 PM PST by Strategerist

To: Strategerist

“Yes. Since it wasn’t, it means there wasn’t an explosion.”

And you base that authoritative “wasn’t” on...?

34 posted on 01/29/2013 2:04:23 PM PST by ctdonath2 (End of debate. Your move.)

To: Strategerist

Since it wasn't, it means there wasn't an explosion.

Actually, without seeing the raw logs, all it means is that IT WASN'T REPORTED as an EARTHQUAKE.

I haven't been able to find the SEISMIC LOGS for that day in IRAN, just IRAN EQ reports.

39 posted on 01/29/2013 2:10:07 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (What difference does it make (if they eat cake)?)

To: Strategerist

How far away would the closest non-Iranian sensors be? Possibly far enough that they wouldn’t detect it?

51 posted on 01/29/2013 3:11:03 PM PST by libstripper

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794