Posted on 01/27/2013 4:55:44 AM PST by Kaslin
It may have been the sheer effrontery of it. Such brazen mendacity, in real time, may leave one breathless.
However Sen Johnson should then have taken a breath and then TAKEN HER DAMNED LYING HEAD OFF. He dropped the ball. Left it there and walked away. SHE was RESPONSIBLE for those lives, period.
It may have been the sheer effrontery of it. Such brazen mendacity, in real time, may leave one breathless.
However Sen Johnson should then have taken a breath and then TAKEN HER DAMNED LYING HEAD OFF. He dropped the ball. Left it there and walked away. SHE was RESPONSIBLE for those lives, period.
The Law of Effect shows us that you generally receive more of the behavior that is rewarded and less of the behavior that is punished. The important point is that there has been no punishment for Hillary Clinton’s negligence. Thus, we can expect more negligence from this administration. How many dead Americans before this administration is called to task? My God, it just hit me. The progressives think there are too many people in this world. They don’t care. They take comfort in dead Americans.
Yup. Johnson could have nailed her and he didn't.
Fail.
Don’t pick on her, because she has ‘optic nerve damage’ from wearing Nancy Pelosi’s coke bottle glasses all day.
Following the House hearings the Chairman of the committee was on Fox News.
He lied through his teeth.
He said they had finally put to rest the notion there was any connection between the video protest in Egypt and the attack in Libya.
The “spontaneous” lie wasn't created AFTER the attack, the attack was planned and carried out to create the “spontaneous” lie.
The “spontaneous” lie is nothing more complicated than trying to make it appear as if the terrorist are so in tune with the news they can pick up on a news story, plan and carry out a terrorist attack immediately. In other words “spontaneous”.
The truth is the news is being orchestrated for the terrorist attacks, which means out little lefty friends which control the news, are collaborating with the terrorist.
That's the reason the “spontaneous” lie was created. Our little lefty friends, including the Zippo WH, have been caught orchestrating news for terrorist attacks, so they created the “spontaneous” lie to make it appear as if the terrorist are planning terrorist attacks AFTER news events.
You can't create the spontaneous lie without there being a coordination between the protest in Egypt and the attack in Libya.
The fact they used the word “spontaneous” is a dead give away Hillary and Zippo planned the attack.
Rush has started a campaign to try and make people believe Hillary is lying to cover up for Zippo, which is complete nonsense when you know the first time the “spontaneous” lie, or something very similar, was attempted was by the ACLU in January of 2006. Zippo wasn't even around at that time, and the ACLU didn't try and create the lie for Bush.
Also there is 2 parts to the “spontaneous” lie.
Go listen to Hillary's statement after the attack and see if you can figure it out.
Nice article, worthy read. I believe similar things happened in West Virginia with coal miners and the mine owners just after WW-1.
“What difference does it make?” So we might say that Her Majesty Secret- ary is showing “indifference”.
...and the supporting actors not questioning the Sociopath of State have pissed on all of us.
Representation for Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods and the rest of us? None.
Bumps in the road for the back-slapping political class.
TREASON...in real-time, pre-meditated, unquestioned, in-your-face, indignant, continuous, unchecked, ongoing...
Translation: It does not matter because we won, and, if we had lost, then, it would have mattered that we tell a better lie.
More of “it’s all relative” doctrine.
More of “it’s all relative” doctrine.
What difference did it make to Vince Foster, Hillary???
This reminds me of something Glenn Beck said a couple of years ago in pointing out how they play their game. He said they just go back and forth and ultimately say, “so what, it doesn’t matter.” His example was Bill Clinton and the Monica Lewisnky affair. At first the argument was, “yes he did/no he didn’t, yes he did/no he didn’t” THEN, when the blue dress gave up definitive proof, the argument shifted to, “so what? why does it matter, it is a private matter”....this is similar to this “what difference does it make at this point” strategy.
McCarthy made the original remark in answer to a question directed to her by Johnny Carson on "The Tonight Show".
The truth is, she’s right. It makes no difference. It made no difference when it happened and it made no difference on election day.
Johnson could have counter punched the ugly old hag but he didn’t. Why? Because it makes no difference.
I’m convinced this election was rigged from the start. In fact, I’m not sure he even got 40% of the vote. The results sure slapped Romney back into reality.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.