[youngidiot]

I simply cringe every time I see a proposal concerning how someone else’s wealth is to be divied up. I see no positives to that way of thinking. Sorry, I just don’t.

Same here. Sadly, that way of thinking is increasingly popular. It's no less idiotic. The "rich" can only do three things with their money: 1) Put it in the bank (good, they'll have more to loan). 2) Spend it. (good, they'll purchase goods and services that keep people working). 3) Expand a business with it (good, more jobs).

The idea that someone having a lot of money is a problem is absurd. And it's rooted in the foolish liberal idea that there's only so much money, that the "rich" took too much of it and that's not fair. Total nonsense.

[muawiyah]

i'm speaking only of how to divvy it up AFTER they're dead. I think it's best to hand it over to the relatives on the outside chance that they carry a gene that put to work can create vast fortunes with immense profits.

Better than just locking the family out and giving the bucks to the professional nonprofit oundation class ~ those people are all scum you know.