Think of the Democrats you know. They are generally prone to emotion over reason.
Lawless told Campus Reform on Tuesday that in her view the findings were proof that President Obama should move swiftly, and without the permission of Congress if necessary, in order limit the availability of firearms.
“The next generation plans on owning guns, so if we want to avoid the tragedies that we’ve seen… we obviously need to move quickly and if an executive order is the way to do it, then that is the way the to do it,” she said.
You have an adult woman professor educated in America calling for:
1. Dictatorship
2.Elimination of the Constitution and individual choice/thought along with it.
At the same time she shows herself unscientific and incapable of logical thought - "if we want to avoid the tragedies that we’ve seen"
Has she scientifically analyzed the Newton shootings?
What was the shooter's motive?
Why did he act? How did he get his weapons?
How common is this type of crime?
Are there alternative answers/solutions that would respect liberty and the Bill of Rights?
What is her hypothesis and has she tested it against historical fact?
Has it been peer reviewed or even publicly published?
So here's a professor utilizing the science of polling, yet unable to use science to think through the solution, let alone the problem. After a half century of this with a generation of ignoramouses being taught by a generation of ignoramous liberals who themselves were taught (indoctrinated) by ignoramous liberals what chance does America have?