Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

NRA could have softened this a bit by including the (no doubt) dozens of other government folk who have children protected by armed security.
Still, NRA made their point.


5 posted on 01/16/2013 3:58:28 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Eric in the Ozarks

I wish NRA would have used moms ,kids, daughters who successfully prevented their own deaths with a gun.(God knows no republicans in office would ever put together such a live video)

Like the 911 woman in GA who shot the turd in the face 5 times.

Victim impact statements are effective.


13 posted on 01/16/2013 4:07:00 PM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

To H E L L with softening reality.


17 posted on 01/16/2013 4:13:36 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I agree. The ad didn't bother me and it's true, but I would like for the NRA to focus on Congressmen and women, actors, rich liberals, idiots like the Kardashians and maybe point out the other elitist that have kids at Sidwell that are all protected by guns. For example, does Chuck Schumer have armed protection? That's what I want to know.
29 posted on 01/16/2013 4:36:25 PM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson