“Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts. These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people. - mitt romney’s signing statement on the bill he signed into law in 2004 permanently banning many semi auto firearms.
If you want to cling to some fantasy that the man who wrote that and attached it to a permanent gun ban would not be working with feinstein and palosi on another gun ban right now had he won, you’re entitled to do so. Just don’t go busting my chops for paying attention to the man’s track record.
Looks to me like what was banned was indeed “assault weapons”. I don’t see where it bans anything over 10 rounds, either. And again, if it was the will of MOST voters in MA, then he was merely doing what his constituents wanted him to do. A big difference from state-level vs. national level.
I understand what you are ‘trying’ to say here. BUT....that still does not negate the FACT that Romney would have been FAR better for America than King Barry...which is, admittedly, not saying much.
But you anti-Romneyites seem to ‘think’ America is better off having Barry, instead of Mitt. If you continue to attempt to argue that point, I’m done. There’s no hope for ya.
Just sayin....
“The new law ensures these deadly weapons, including AK-47s, UZIs and Mac-10 rifles, are permanently prohibited in Massachusetts no matter what happens on the federal level.”
http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/01/barack-will-never-allow-you-to-go-back-to-your-lives-as-usual/