Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: EternalVigilance
Oh this will work out well for the GOP establishment.
Hello Whig Party....
2 posted on
01/13/2013 7:35:08 AM PST by
Kozak
(The Republic is dead. I do not owe what we have any loyalty, wealth or sympathy.)
To: EternalVigilance
Just how many liberal and moderate gop senate candidates lost?
3 posted on
01/13/2013 7:37:42 AM PST by
Sybeck1
To: EternalVigilance
Talk about old news, decades old news...
4 posted on
01/13/2013 7:37:57 AM PST by
gunsequalfreedom
(Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
To: EternalVigilance
That does it...I’m registering as an Independent. Screw the GOP.
To: EternalVigilance
So, according to Politico, the Washington team is gearing up a new effort to protect incumbents and limit the ability of Republican voters to successfully challenge establishment candidates
It’s been done for a while now. That’s how we got Mutt as a candidate.
6 posted on
01/13/2013 7:41:45 AM PST by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: EternalVigilance
The Republican voter base is in an abusive relationship with the GOPe. It’s time for the base to file for divorce. And a restraining order.
To: EternalVigilance
Snowe, Brown and Lugar were replaced by Cruz, Flake and Fischer.
They hate that!
To: EternalVigilance
Rove and Romney and Boehner are NOT satisfied
with ruining TWO elections and placing the Tyrant
in office.
The GOP is the enemy of Conservatives.
11 posted on
01/13/2013 7:46:38 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
To: EternalVigilance
What more can the GOPe do?
They have already successfully shoved mcLame and then milt down our throats.
To: holdonnow; suspects
15 posted on
01/13/2013 7:49:24 AM PST by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: EternalVigilance
As seen from the halls of power, the problem is that Republican voters think it's OK to replace incumbent senators and congressman who don't represent the views of their constituents.*************
Isn't that the whole purpose behind "government of the people, by the people and for the people" or am I missing something?
Besides, all they do with the majorities we hand them is to continue our march off the cliff, or else cave and surrender. Who needs the GOP elite when they can't win the game with the players we send in?
Screw 'em. We'll keep throwing out bums and losers, again and again and again, until we get results, dammit!
17 posted on
01/13/2013 7:52:07 AM PST by
DNME
(Without the Constitution, there is no legitimate U.S. government. Period.)
To: EternalVigilance
And of course, should an honest, conservative Republican candidate manage to win despite the efforts of the GOP-e, they'll try their best to corrupt them, to get them over to the dark side...
"We dont need a lot of Jim DeMint disciples. As soon as they get here, we need to co-opt them.
18 posted on
01/13/2013 7:52:43 AM PST by
COBOL2Java
(kak-is-toc-ra-cy: Government by the least qualified or most unprincipled citizens. See: GOP-e)
To: EternalVigilance
We still pay attention to Rasmussen?
21 posted on
01/13/2013 7:56:55 AM PST by
palmer
(Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
To: EternalVigilance
Yeah, what a bunch of antidisestablishmentarianism!
24 posted on
01/13/2013 8:00:01 AM PST by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month)
To: EternalVigilance
The problem is that too many of our little Republican primary voters are themselves establishment or establishment-wannabees, the kind receptive to Jebbie for 2016 because “only he can win.”
27 posted on
01/13/2013 8:04:57 AM PST by
Theodore R.
("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
To: EternalVigilance
I didn’t leave the GOP, they left me.
28 posted on
01/13/2013 8:05:46 AM PST by
Huskrrrr
To: EternalVigilance
On an another note, why do we allow Iowa and New Hampshire pick our candidate? They don’t vote for them in the general!!
32 posted on
01/13/2013 8:07:01 AM PST by
Sybeck1
To: EternalVigilance
Yep, patriotic American conservatives have been some of the most despised people in the country (and the world) for a while now. We’re the thorn in the side of the totalitarians that never completely goes away.
36 posted on
01/13/2013 8:15:42 AM PST by
jpl
(The government spent another half a million bucks in the time it just took you to read this tagline.)
To: EternalVigilance
They truly are stupid. Without the base, they will never win control. But then, I think the GOP establishment prefers to be in the minority.
38 posted on
01/13/2013 8:18:19 AM PST by
AdaGray
(squi)
To: EternalVigilance
This infuriated establishment Republicans for two reasons. First, because they liked Lugar and the way he worked. Second, because the replacement candidate was flawed and allowed Democrats to win what should have been a safe Republican seat.
This is not completely true. Mark Kirk was flawed and still won because the GOP-e supported him to the hilt, as did rank and file conservatives, foolishly. Meanwhile Mourdock lost in Indiana not because he was flawed, but because the GOP-e bailed on him because he defeated one of their golden boys. Same thing happened to Christine O'Donnell in Delaware. Until conservatives learn NEVER to support liberal Republicans under any circumstances, nothing will change.
40 posted on
01/13/2013 8:19:00 AM PST by
Antoninus
(Sorry, gone rogue.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson