Posted on 01/11/2013 7:58:53 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Piers is the very definition of a troll and been given way to much attention. He has managed to pick the scab of gun control for far to long. It’s time to go after his advertisers and shut the creep down.
MORGAN: How dare you accuse me of standing on the graves of the children that died there. How dare you.
SHAPIRO: Ive seen you do it repeatedly, Piers.
Pricelss.
MORGAN: How dare you accuse me of standing on the graves of the children that died there. How dare you.Priceless.
SHAPIRO: Ive seen you do it repeatedly, Piers.
MORGAN: Like I say, how dare you.
SHAPIRO: Well, I mean, you can keep saying that, but youve done it repeatedly
” Then why dont you care about banning the handguns in Chicago?”
I thought they were banned in Chicago.
His show was not successful and this attention spotlight has been a godsend for him. If his ratings go up you can be sure he will continue.
Actual conversation I had:
Them: We need to ban assault weapons. They are only good for killing lots of people.
Me: What about the police?
Them: Oh the police can have them.
Me: Why? So they can kill lots of people?
Them: No, to protect themselves
Me: I thought you said they were only good for killing lots of ....
Them: I know what I said. But the police are trained to use them.
Me: Trained to kill lots of people with them?
Actual conversation in California years ago.
Them: I’m glad they banned assault weapons.
Me: Let me show you something.
Them: You can’t have that, that is an assault weapon.
Me: That is a Springfield M1A, a semi auto version of the M14, a battle rifle, not an assualt weapon.
Them: speachless.
Perfectly formatted. Thank you so much.
Bookmarked.
Piers is an overbearing, loathsome jerk.
There is a US show where a British Subject berates free Americans and mocks their Constitutional and Rights???
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
I thought we finished this argument around 1812?
er, meant:
...Constitutional and HUMAN Rights....
This subversive Red-Coat needs to be kicked back to Great Britain.
The comments following the article criticize Shapiro for giving up too much to the Piers types, though his remarks against Morgan were well placed, but when he failed to oppose registry, outright, he drops the ball entirly. Comments claim that Ben is basically a GOP establishment guy, on the 2A, (willing to entertain the moderate/left compromises that are chipping away at gun rights).
I didn’t view the video, but proving debate prowess to nail opponents is different from actually defending 2A and we need to recognize the difference. I am speaking to my self here, btw.
Wondering if you got that drift in Shapiro on the matter of registry?
I would have loved to have seen Morgan take that bait...
The correct response then would have been THEY ARE ALREADY BANNED PIERS AND LOOK HOW IT DOESNT WORK
MORGAN: Well come to that.
That is ALL THIS IS ABOUT!
We will come to that!
FIRST ban "Assault Weapons"
THEN WE CAN GO AFTER THE REST OF THE GUNS!
Won’t happen, he says Obama laughed at the petition to have Piers deported. Anyway we all know the democrats love having non producing aliens in the country.
“I’d piss on piers morgan except that I don’t want to give him the sexual gratification that he’d get from it.
ROTFLMAO
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.