wow.
So when they admit they’d legalize people drugging and having sex with their own kids, that’d be fine?
I’m not in favor of gun control, I think 11-year old girls should be able to by shoulder-laaunched SAMs for gosh sakes.
“I’m not in favor of gun control, I think 11-year old girls should be able to by shoulder-laaunched SAMs for gosh sakes.”
HA! I knew you were a sinking commie! 9 year-old girls should have them (and boys when they turn 18 after proving they are as mature as a 9 year-old girl).
Seriously, though, the overwhelming majority of libertarians want the same thing: most decisions made at the STATE level as mandated by the Constitution. Yes, that includes dope (although forcing kids to take them at the direction of their parents is very un-libertarian). Listen, let Californians kill themselves with junk. If the feds were neutered in fact the way they are neutered by the Constitution, that wouldn’t be an issue. Just don’t claim a right to regulate drug laws based on the Commerce Clause and then say it doesn’t apply for federal laws on firearms.
Support the Constitution at the federal level and then fight the libertarians at the state level. Heck, I’ll probably be right there with you, but *not* at the federal level. That’s not a power granted by the Constitution to the Federal Government.
That’s why I’m so frustrated with this “libertarian” vs. “conservative” BS. It’s a made-up argument by the left to neuter those who want the Constitution actually implemented.