Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TurboZamboni

The juicy part of this story is that he was charged because he violated Hipaa. :-)

Of course that won’t stick, but it is interesting that they went to those lengths to bring charges.


8 posted on 01/09/2013 5:56:22 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf

“charged because he violated Hipaa”

ROTFLMAO


13 posted on 01/09/2013 6:43:11 AM PST by A Strict Constructionist (We're an Oligrachy...Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

Then there’s this gem:

“Eggers noted that the incident report said nothing was recorded on the camera.

“I mean, were you just pointing it?” he asked Henderson.

“No. It was deleted,” Henderson surmised.

“You deleted it?”

“No. She must have deleted it,” Henderson said, referring to Muellner.

Not possible, Eggers replied. “There would have been some documentation about that.” “

______________________

Sure, police always file a report when they do something illegal or improper. It’s impossible that they wouldn’t file a report incriminating themselves :P

If you are going to record the police it’s probably best to do it on your phone, and make sure the phone has a password lock on it. Then, lock your phone before you hand it over to the police. They can’t force you to unlock your phone just so they can view/delete the video.


17 posted on 01/09/2013 9:42:21 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson