Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude

“I always tell these sick liberals who still pretend to oppose pedophilia that I can get them to fess up to their support for sexual activity involving children.”

The thing is that they cant! If they are all for gay marriage and for normalizing all of the other sexual kinks that are at your usual gay parade then they have no ability to draw a line anywhere on anything. What would be their rationale, that THIS particular thing is immoral? Immoral according to whom? The church that they rejected and attacked because they saw homosexuality as immoral? Without that it’s all just a question of time before those freaks start to assert their “rights” as an “oppressed minority” like the homos did.


26 posted on 01/07/2013 11:22:42 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: VanDeKoik
Their almighty criterion is "consent," which is as changeable as a legislature. Otherwise, how can there be different legal ages for "consent" to sexual conduct in different states (Massachusetts sets it at 15!!!!)

Again, ask liberals if they oppose sexual activity among children, considering that they campaign endlessly to provide contraception and abortion (without parental consent) to them. Their eventual answer, if you keep the pressure on them, will be revealing.

37 posted on 01/07/2013 12:04:23 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson