Living on a shoe-string, A fifty cent millionaire...To Warren’s way of thinking, there are only two classes. The communist elite and everyone else (the unwashed masses) that they rule over.
Wow, only Innerparty and Proles in Warren’s view?
Another brilliant, intellectual, intensely bright
Progressive moron.
(Scu&bags one and all)
IMHO
Communists don’t know what middle class is..they just know how to take other people’s money
She can’t define what truth means, facts, reality, and many other things.
Living on a shoe-string, A fifty cent millionaire...Our Republic is broken as moron voters vote someone like this lying, hyocrite, idiot person into a leadership position. If the teepees burn this a$$hat would use bacon grease to try and douse the flames.
Democrats are such lemmings. Vote for ANYONE with a D beside their name. That is why we are in the mess we are in.
This is not unexpected or surprising. I was viewing comments earlier on a story regarding wage comparisons. To my amusement, I kept seeing the typical vague references to a ‘living wage’ and ‘enough to raise a family’. What are those amounts, and who determines the amounts?
I could be quite comfortable at even $1 k per month, as I have no debt and live frugally - and take great comfort and pride in doing so. So, does someone get to arbitrarily determine that in order to have ‘enough to raise a family’, you would need a TV in three rooms of the house, cable, multiple new gadgets yearly, a vehicle with bling that is less than 5 years old, new fashionable clothing??? What is the threshold of this amount? While I could be happy and well taken care of on a minimal amount, that would be a pittance to most who would cringe at the neglect that such a small amount would represent. These talking point phrases are so obscure that the idiots who spout them haven’t even considered what they should represent. All they consider is that someone has more than them (neglecting the obvious fact that that individual’s efforts and hard work created the wage gap), and that is by liberal thought, unfair. In order for someone to have more, than someone had to be stolen from in order to produce it, right?!?!?!?
But I bet she has a killer family recipe for chipped pemmican on fry bread.
Honest injun?
if we have to define ‘classes’ (which is unAmerican)... it would be easily done with math
poor: bottom 10%
lower middle class: bottom 10-25%
middle class: 25-75%
upper middle class: 75-90%
upper class: 90-99%
rich: top 1%
the actual salary lines would vary year to year as determined by gross income
Liberals also can’t define the words “fair share” and what percentage of income of the rich should be their fair share. Nothing will be a fair share of the rich unless the gov’t takes 100% of their income.
The ‘’rich’’ Obama speaks of is anyone with a job.
Webster-1887 "Middle Class"- In England, people who have an intermediate position between the nobility or leisured class and the working class."
1) Working class: if you work for someone else for a paycheck, then you're working class.
2) Middle class was defined as doctors, lawyers, small business owners, and senior management of large corporations, and those of similar income -- people with some degree of independence.
3) The wealthy were those who could maintain an opulent lifestyle off of the income from their investments.