Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man

Exactly. I don’t remember reading in the bill of rights anywhere where it said these rights were to be based on demonstrated need. These are rights, period. Hey DiFi, by that “logic” applied to the first amendment, we should all have to justify a need for Facebook accounts with more than ten friends. Our maybe license email. Our limit address books in smartphones. Can’t have you communicating with too many people.

Bottom line, I probably don’t need a thirty round magazine. But i absolutely need the freedom to own one because you Di, and the government, are prevented from infringing upon my rights. When you try, that’s wrong. If you succeed, then we have tyranny, not some day in the future, but right here, right now.


72 posted on 01/03/2013 5:32:28 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ThunderSleeps

Wonder if DIFI is for having women justify and register themselves for exercising their “right” to abortions? This is supposedly a constitutionally-protected “right”. Let’s be consistent here. After all she’s worried about the slaughter of innocents in both cases, right?


104 posted on 01/03/2013 9:46:05 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson