Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RJS1950
Put your stupid confederate idea of “War of Northern Aggression” aside once and for all. The southern democrats tried to throw aside the Constitution in the name of slavery and lost. Get the hell over it.

Spoken like a hardcore lib. Make personal attacks and mis-state facts when the only thing you have to contribute is factually inaccurate, simple minded and ludicrous.

I could agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.

50 posted on 12/30/2012 4:52:49 PM PST by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: ConservaTexan

You can take your hardcore lib comment and stuff it. The hardcore lib comment is a misstatement of fact, is fatually inaccurate, simple minded and ludicrous. I swore an oath and spent a career promising to uphold and defend the Constitution and I still hold to that oath.

You, on the other hand, hold on to a conflict and mythical ideal that was ended almost 150 years ago. A democrat party myth at that. I’m tired of the stupid “lost cause” comments that come up every time this type of topic comes up.

Are you a supporter of the Constitution and the Republic or would you let a long lost democrat inspired attempt to dissolve the union get in the way of restoring the Constitution and Republic? In 1860 the democrat party wanted to read the Constitution in such a way that they could retain slavery “The Cause”. Now the same party of slavery wants to throw out the Constitution to hold all productive citizens as tax slaves and slaves to a socialist system that serves them and their no-work supporters.

Which is it? Are you a supporter of the Constitutional principles or are you a supporter of the party of slavery principles which are the same now as then.


234 posted on 12/31/2012 9:17:58 AM PST by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: All

we need more FIRST TIME buyers.

The more individuals who have “something” out there, the better for the first amendment.

It will be like trying to outlaw shoes.


237 posted on 12/31/2012 9:39:27 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson