Certainly, for those who bothered to read, and knew the lie that “it wasn't defined in the Constitution.” The Constitution explicitly contains no definitions, with one refinement of a common-law term because our nation was not a monarchy. Our framers were brilliant men who wanted the Constitution to have eternal validity, and word definitions change with time. Putting definitions into the document would have rendered it a flawed curiousity in less than a century. It was designed be be, and Chief Justice Waite explained, interpreted in the common-law and language familiar to its framers.
With Obama illegitimate, anything goes. Those who care will have to fight each attack on individual sovereignty again, as Obama packs the court. I'm looking at Canada for my children, but have hopes for Singapore, Israel, and even China, where there is great respect for excellence, and the pay for scientists is now higher than than salaries in the US, where the jobs are disappearing.
Last time I looked Microsoft had four campuses in China, four in Israel, and just one in Canada. They'll keep the Redmond campus for a while, unless Obama tries to shake them down as he just has Toyota, and as Clinton did ten years ago, when Canada offered Microsoft a new home. Obama is a junkie with a silver spoon he probably can't control, or reject at this point. Corrections will come, but too late for me.
There is no reason for my children to struggle to support thuggish government unions and their overpriced drones. As Stalin explained, as long as the SEIU counts our votes we will never prevail in an election. Our pundits, if they had any grasp of quantitative reasoning, or even a little experience with criminal law, would know that our voting system is absolutely without an audit trail. There can be no “chain of evidence” for votes because ballots, if they are used, disappear into the caves of the SEIU where they are “counted”, or not, with no oversight. Is anyone so naive as to assume that an SEIU employee, whose job, future, and probably the health of his/her family depends upon keeping silent, would report that votes aren't counted at all?
Any votes cast via computer leave no trace of the real intent of voters. We do not have a representative republic. Congress is about as much representation as we can hope for. The vote counts all over the country in which Obama received more votes than registered voters will get no attention. The perception that Romney was popular was no illusion. Even the media couldn't cover it up. But Obama used to teach vote fraud when he worked for Project Vote, and Acorn subsidiary. He knew he needn't worry. The busing of illegals was probably unnecessary, since we have no audit-able vote count. IN any case, Republican poll watchers are constrained any place the opposition cares to claim there may be a racist bias, by a law suit decided by a judge, long retired, but who returns yearly to re-assert his order from the bench preventing Republicans from approaching precincts.
It is a little complicated. They count on your ignorance. The only really secure voting mechanism, one which was once the standard in this country, and still is in Israel, is to have volunteers count paper ballots before the ballots leave the precinct, and count them in the presence of observers from all parties. Volunteers have honor. They don't want to be found cheating. They live in the precinct they monitor.
Once the local count is made, it becomes the official count and the ballots are stored securely, never to be accessed without a court order. We don't have that mechanism today so that people, probably both parties at different times, can cheat. No comment about election results could be used as valid statistical data because there is no chain of evidence. It keeps the natives believing we have representative government. We don't, but many of us still believe in individual sovereignty. We will watch it disappear until we organize, or leave. Until more realize that votes are simply a propaganda tool, there can be no changes. They control the count, as Stalin observed, and thus control our future, telling us what they want us to believe are the wishes of the majority.
I just read the Resolution, and it says no such thing. FWIW.