I was agreeing with him on some of his earlier post. It may be a good idea to post a few arms for sale in newspapers and such , but don't sell'm .
That's a good idea. Personally none of my 20+ guns have any paper on them at all so it is unlikely they would be contacting me in the first place. If they pulled an 0-dark thirty armed home invasion (aka a No-Knock Warrant) then it will be bloodier than a Tarantino movie.
But that is not how gun turn-ins and door-to-door confiscations would be conducted. For one thing the NKW method would require more personnel and vastly larger sums of money. They won't have enough of either to do simple door-to-door contacts. We're talking tens, if not hundreds, of billions of dollars and with the economy about to do a swan dive into a kettle of boiling Greece that's not going to happen.
But the D-to-D method means that there will be lots of advance warning except for those unfortunate ones who are contacted in the first couple of weeks. There is no one way to handle a situation that you can set in stone ahead of time. Or shouldn't be. I deal with things by doing what is appropriate in the moment. As you said, fighting on your terms and not theirs is the preferable thing to do. That can take many forms depending upon circumstances.