Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

Do that and you’ll be heavily taxing anyone who decides to invest, rather than consume, their income after they’ve already paid taxes on it.

On the other hand, anyone who spends all of their income doesn’t have to pay any more than any sales taxes for spending it all.

That is a major tax hit on those who would do what is better for our economy—and manifestly unfair.


39 posted on 12/19/2012 5:22:12 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker
You are drawing a distinction that does not exist in reality. Every swinging ....... invests every day in his own continued existence. Sometimes he makes a profit and sometimes he doesn't.

Someone with a bit more saved up might invest in something a bit beyond his control ~ stocks, bonds, simple bank savings ~ maybe a new car so he can travel to a better job. Someone with even more savings might open up a business and employ himself, or maybe just hire a manager to run the shop.

You work your way up the line and you'll find that NO ONE with some little bit of free money (not tied down by basic investments in meat, potatoes and condiments) gives up trying to make more money.

Current rules allow GE to not make a profit ~ so they didn't pay any taxes!

I want that part!

40 posted on 12/19/2012 5:38:04 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson