[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Chaffetz is a member of the Issa House committee....so I don’t think he is slacking off....

[Roccus]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/26/cia-operators-were-denied-request-for-help-during-benghazi-attack-sources-say/

IMO, the “sources on the ground” mentioned in the video are some of these survivors.

As for Issa and the House Committee on Hindsight and Government Expansion.....IMO, the dog and pony show that his F&F hearings became is a coming attraction for any Benghazi hearings.....with about the same results.

[Marine_Uncle]

I understand. But from what that early committee was investigating, turned out to be a whole knew scenario if all we have been reading in the past month is actually true.
It is like they (others who would follow) set up.
To the tee they followed the earliest understandings that a Department of State facility was attacked for some reason.
Now they are faced with what yet has not been told by Petreous and others regarding the real reasons things happened as they did. For instance, it being a CIA operation, whereby the rules of the road may change completely as how and what those other then the Senate and the House Intel committees are allowed to investigate.

Put another way. Investigating something that was not the case would be futile at this point in time. Of course they can go after the administration on the issues revolving around false pretenses that the deaths where caused by demonstrations that went haywire caused by the video.
We can scrap over things like where said "that al Qaeda was on the inside". I'm not suggesting any of the Congressional Committees in their given capacities, drop off the case, but am saying it now takes on a different perspective, where some of them may be told, sorry charlie, this was a clandestine operation that went wrong. The public cannot be told the truth, type of deal.