Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
That's the point. Natural law, which would be key to identifying the essential public policy interests. I think the Courts would say the States have a legitimate interest in insuring that people whose sexual relations put them in the way of procreating, should be held accountable for indentifying and providing for the children they procreate.

Provisions of law that tend to make thier conjugal relationship stable, secure, and durable would be viewed as rational.

206 posted on 12/11/2012 1:26:32 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

Will you translate that into English? What is your point?


227 posted on 12/11/2012 1:47:57 PM PST by ansel12 (A.Coulter2005(truncated)Romney will never recover from his Court's create of a right to gay marriage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson