Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scoutmaster

Zimmerman’s response to the dispatcher (not an LEO) was “OK.” People assume that Z continued to follow Martin, but is that in fact true? Martin was bashing Z’s head against a concrete sidewalk and not soft grassy turf. The evidence is clear. Therefore I can only assume that Z left the site and was returning to his car parked along the sidewalk. Martin turned around and approached Z from behind and initated the attack which ended up with Zimmerman on the ground/sidewalk with his nose broken and his skull cracked.


44 posted on 12/10/2012 2:43:48 PM PST by ArmyTeach ( Videteco eos prius (See 'em first) Sculpin 191)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: ArmyTeach

Check this breakdown out. It has the timeline combined with the phone call.

http://www.wagist.com/2012/dan-linehan/evidence-that-trayvon-martin-doubled-back


46 posted on 12/10/2012 2:54:59 PM PST by HawkHogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: ArmyTeach; lacrew
In O'Meara's cross-examination of Inspector Dale Gilbreath at a bond hearing, Gilbreath admits that the State has no evidence to dispute Zimmerman's statement that he headed back to his truck.

In the same hearing prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda states that Martin bought a can of tea at the 7-11 and Gilbreath agrees, under oath. We know Martin didn't buy tea.

49 posted on 12/10/2012 3:12:34 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson