1 posted on
12/07/2012 7:30:45 PM PST by
neverdem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: neverdem
What’s wrong with the old Tappan Zee bridge?? I liked that bridge ...
2 posted on
12/07/2012 7:33:36 PM PST by
Ken522
To: neverdem
It suppose to be a bridge not work of art.
To: neverdem
The cool thing about the Tappan Zee Bridge is that on a clear day you can see the Manhattan skyline in the distance.
4 posted on
12/07/2012 7:35:15 PM PST by
Gay State Conservative
(Benghazi: What Did Baraq Know And When Did He Know It?)
To: neverdem
To: neverdem
They better never ever plead poverty again if they have $3-5 BILLION laying around
12 posted on
12/07/2012 7:48:09 PM PST by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: neverdem
How does lower future tolls LOWER the price of the bridge??
13 posted on
12/07/2012 7:49:56 PM PST by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: neverdem
When they first told us that the “new World Trade Center” would cost $1 Billion, I said, “But what about the Mafia Tax? It will be $3 Billion before it’s done!”
So, about that bridge.....I suggest asking Boston about their tunnel estimates.
14 posted on
12/07/2012 7:52:16 PM PST by
G Larry
(Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
To: neverdem
I’d like to see how they intend to change the traffic paterns for the rush hours with those two, separate spans.
18 posted on
12/07/2012 7:58:44 PM PST by
Roccus
To: neverdem
The key to this area no matter, is for an understated design.
19 posted on
12/07/2012 7:59:32 PM PST by
Varsity Flight
(Extortion-Care is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
To: neverdem
One final smooth layer of asphalt might help the current TZ, instead of the patchwork fillings on the East sides of both lanes.
In the 21st Century is that not possible??
27 posted on
12/07/2012 8:27:12 PM PST by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: neverdem
Also known as the “Tappin’ Zee Brakes.”
28 posted on
12/07/2012 8:37:00 PM PST by
Edmund
To: neverdem
I’d vote for ‘2’ if the taxpayers want to waste their money on something.
29 posted on
12/07/2012 8:44:02 PM PST by
PAR35
To: neverdem
unfortunately it's impossible now to put the bridge where it belongs at a NARROWER spot in the river...
30 posted on
12/07/2012 8:47:51 PM PST by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: neverdem
Number 3 looks like an S not a Zee.
31 posted on
12/07/2012 8:50:58 PM PST by
Tanniker Smith
(Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
To: cyborg; Clemenza; Cacique; NYCVirago; The Mayor; Darksheare; hellinahandcart; Chode; ...
34 posted on
12/07/2012 9:16:50 PM PST by
neverdem
( Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
36 posted on
12/07/2012 10:09:26 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: neverdem
They will need somewhere to spend all the federal SANDY money! Civilians won’t count when billions are flowing through politicians hands.
To: neverdem
I wonder how much less it would cost without union labor and union work rules?
I would estimate about 50% at least.
40 posted on
12/08/2012 4:12:00 AM PST by
DH
(Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
To: neverdem
Looks good for a 15 dollar plus ride across it! The GW bridge and some others are now 14 dollars to cross. A rig with a few axes can cost up to 75 dollars or more to cross. Where’s all the money going? Education? how much more money do we need for education when the kids are getting dumber and thier propaganda agenda is progressing nicely. oops did I say that?
To: neverdem
I like design 2. Of course I give a rat’s ass because I left NY and I won’t be paying for this.
42 posted on
12/08/2012 4:25:45 AM PST by
angcat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson