[SamuraiScot]

Traditional First Amendment jurisprudence is that you can say some awfully outrageous things and still walk with impunity.

Somewhere between proven malice and "reckless disregard of the truth" creates a semi-truck sized target on the NBC peacock's butt, if I recall the guidelines on suits like this. It wasn't even reckless. It was selective and intentional, in order to make him sound like a bigot. I think they have a problem.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Ya gotta wonder how they can be so cold, as to gin up false sensation. It ain’t just personal to Zimmerman. It’s the way they address the whole world.

[CottShop]

[[”reckless disregard of the truth”]]

I woudl label it “reckless disregard of the truth with maliscious intent purposefully designed to destroy an innocent person” And everyoen involved in this travesty of justice shoudl be completely ashamed of themselves- but as we’ve seen, the MSM knows no shame, even when it coems to purposefulyl destroying innocent people’s lives for hte sake of ratings