The stricter safety guidelines were rejected in May by District Judge Donald Worthington
Justice Noma Gurich, who issued her own ruling blocking the law shortly before she was appointed to the Supreme Court
Remember these evil ones who believe they represent JUSTICE!
How in the name of God can abortion be remotely considered constitutional?
What about the right to life? This evil act assumes the child is the property of the mother and she can do as she pleases with it. Disgusting that this is going on in the 21st century. This is a state supreme court that clearly is Godless, uncaring and deserving of being kicked off the court!
Oklahoma is NOT a left-wing Godless state and its citizens should not permit this evil.
The tyranny of the Black Robes.
A society that wantonly slaughters its most innocent is a doomed society.
We need to ban Abortions.(which to me is covered under ‘murder’ in all our laws...but obviously isn’t). start with late term then work backward to all abortions.
doing an end run around the law by forcing the women into viewing an ultrasound, does not sound constitutional to me either. Just my $0.02.
Although this Judge probably goes to Church services, his decision has nothing to do with God, and everything to do with political correctness as it is today.
Women have brought this on themselves. It is the real snake in the Garden of Eden. The Apple they cannot refuse to bite.
Straining out legal gnats and swallowing camels, of course.
Until there is a definitive answer to the baleful shadow of Roe v. Wade, there can’t be a whole lot specifically done to slow down abortions lest a “right” be “infringed.” The law done been hijacked.
Not that there aren’t other measures possible, and of course they are. For just one instance, there ought to be “public service” commercials all over the place showing what ultrasounds look like with today’s modern machines.
What I would like to know is how the court can say it is permissible/constitutional to abort/kill a baby in the womb and then, in the next case, turn around and charge someone with two counts of murder when someone kills a pregnant woman. You can’t have it both ways.
When is a scan prenatal counseling and care and when is it abortion restriction?
Based on the court’s tortured interpretation couldn’t we claim that every pregnant woman who visits a hospital and undergoes a scan is a potential abortion patient rather than an expectant mother? If so aren’t all OB/GYN clinics on notice?
This kind of blows the lid off the left’s guise of ‘education’ being the basis behind sex ed. After all, if they were all about education, and they really believed a ‘fetus’ was just a ‘clump of cells’, you could discuss development and show ultrasounds all day long. If we had a news media that was actually free and ethical, this would be trumpeted. Instead, they’ll celebrate the right to murder.
Translation: “There are too many restrictions on the slaughter of children. We need to remove those restrictions, especially because of all those ugly black ones that no one will adopt.”