Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yosemitest

What you may endear to yourself (hey by the way, recent news from Uganda should cheer you, they’re back to stoning gays, even those who only give sidelong curious looks let alone sodomy — you will thrill to hear about the real witch hunt going on, in the name of the bible no less) as “the base” isn’t what I meant by “Mitt’s base” meaning those people eligible to vote who passively polled, in private polls, as preferring Mitt to Obama. “Mitt’s base” was larger than “Obama’s base” as analogously defined. However, passive preferences did not transfer to active attendance at polls. Even Democrats are marveling that Mitt did not put more energy into his campaign, which would have gotten more of that passive base off its duffs.

Anyhow I know you clearly despise Mitt, but facts are facts.


43 posted on 12/01/2012 12:14:17 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
Fact ARE facts.
"Establishment Republicans" lose!
49 posted on 12/01/2012 11:59:36 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson