Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nowhere Man
If you look at Lincoln's earlier record he was for what in retrospect is a modest expansion of government -- a protective tariff, aid for railroad, road, and canal construction, national banks -- but not for restrictions on individual liberties or for a powerful presidency.

He did what any other head of state would do when faced with the situation of 1861. He did what Jefferson Davis did in the Confederacy. Davis and his crew wanted as much of the US as they could tear away. To be sure they didn't want free states and territories, but they favored doing any damage to the US that they could in hopes that it would further their cause.

So Lincoln supported some temporary wartime restrictions on liberty -- just as Davis did. Just as other war time presidents did. And many of those who were affected were themselves militant supporters of the other side who would do any damage they could to get what they wanted.

212 posted on 11/29/2012 1:39:47 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: x

One may also note that during the War of the Great Rebellion, that the US Supreme Court held sessions.

Jeff Davis never got around to appointing any justices to the pretended supreme court of the pretended confederacy. He didn’t care much for law, actually. I guess there was a reason why U.S. Grant called one of his horses “Jeff Davis”.


216 posted on 11/29/2012 1:52:17 PM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson