Either you replied to the wrong poster or you have serious reading comprehension problems. I hope your problem is the former, not the latter.
Anyway, I said during the primaries I would never vote for the Massachusetts liberal and father of Mengelecare, Mittens Romney, and I didn’t. I could spot that loser a mile away.
I will also reiterate that only a fool or a moron would fall for the Democrat newsroom propaganda that Romney’s “47%” remark was a “gaffe”. I guess some people are easily led by the nose...
Romney’s “gaffe” was trying to distance himself from his own remark rather than back it up with raw data that showed that yep, the welfare / food stamp crowd was all in Ubama’s pocket. Then, and only then, did the Democrat newsrooms (and the fools who believe them) chuckle and nod that, yep, it was a gaffe alright.
So there. I responded to your post even though it made avsolutely no sense to me in the context of anything I posted. I’m pretty sure your reply was meant for somebody else.
FRegards,
LH
It was a terrible gaffe, what is the “raw data”, who are the 47%, what is the 47%?
Why couldn’t the freakazoid explain his own statement?