We are supposed to believe the 47% remark was a gaffe. It will be hammered into us until it becomes “conventional wisdom”. But it’s a lie. It will however have the effect in future elections that the truth is to be avoided at all cost.
As big and costly a gaffe as it was, no one ever succeeded in defining what it meant, did they?
Did Romney ever succeed in defining it, who is the 47% that he dismisses??
Where have you been? The truth is to be avoided at all costs by the GOP.......re-read some the FR posts and you'll learn Myth was pro-life, pro-RKBA, and the second coming of Reagan (I think I threw up a little when I read that one).
The truth, that was avoided at all costs is Myth was and is a pro-baby murder, anti-gun, pro-faggotry liberal.
The truth will continue to be avoided at all costs because by and large the majority of alleged conservatives will vote whoever the (R) party throws at them. The stupid party has no reason to change because when it comes down to "their guy" conservatives will swallow anything.
Anyone that disagrees will be branded a traitor and a communist. Bill fluken-Ayers could run on the (R) ticket and win the nomination and there will be supposed conservatives lining up to vote for him and will call you a commie for not supporting him. They will twist themselves into pretzels explaining how the other GOPE pawns in Kongress will hold his feet to the fire and that he isn't as bad as the alternative.
Of course the NRA will also go to bat for the (R) candidate and pretend they didn't push "assault" weapons bans. The sheeple will eat it right up and believe whatever the NRA puts out. See Myth Romney 2012 for a prime example.
The majority of conservatives are good for burning up phone lines, writing their Kongresscrats, and waving a Gadsden flag in DC, but at the end of the day they'll crawl over broken glass for whatever liberal jackass the Stupid Party puts at the top of the ticket.
Shameful.