Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JLS

Wrong answer. You are describing a “refundable tax credit,” which as we see from the EITC is a recipe for fraud. A flat tax on income (not on consumption) and no rebate is a better way to go. Even setting aside fraud, your suggestion still requires a massive bureaucracy to administer the rebate scheme and to combat fraud.


27 posted on 11/22/2012 11:53:42 AM PST by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: dinodino

Your status quo keeps a intact a massive bureaucracy namely the IRS. A consumption tax is certainly a better way to go than having to report to the government all sources of your income.


50 posted on 11/22/2012 6:02:59 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson