Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 92nina

Yes, I have to agree with your point, and I realized that.
Ideally, it would work best if all states changed the apportionment of electoral votes, but that is not going to happen.

On the other hand, republicans are currently in control of what are usually regarded as blue states such as Pennsylvania. We got Ohio too. And we have Virginia. And Florida. The advantage is obvious.

It is quite possible that states will go back and forth on how they allocate the electoral votes depending on the party in power. If we have control of a blue state why not go for it? We have to take every advantage we can get against the cheaters.

The odds of us periodically controlling a blue state are infinitely better than a red state going blue.


26 posted on 11/21/2012 6:42:50 PM PST by A'elian' nation (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: A'elian' nation

“It is quite possible that states will go back and forth on how they allocate the electoral votes depending on the party in power.”

While that may be fine (and advantageous to the GOP) in the short term, I think many people (on both sides) would view this blatant partisan manipulation of the Electoral College negatively. It would give plenty of ammo (in terms of popular support) to the people who advocate ending the Electoral College entirely.


32 posted on 11/21/2012 7:01:45 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: A'elian' nation

Yeah. I say let’s try it in PA. Not sure about OH/VA/FL, though.


34 posted on 11/21/2012 7:50:19 PM PST by 92nina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson