And yes, there was massive voter fraud. Many of the votes that would have to be accepted were cast illegally, so a recount may not have given him victory.
Obama retook the WH on the basis of 500,000 votes in 5 key swing states.
This is a paltry number easily achieved by well-managed fraud. For example, it is statistically impossible that hundreds of precincts in PA and OH did not show a single (1) vote for Romney. It is also statistically impossible that many precincts in those key states showed close to 100% turnout, when the average in that state was closer to 60%. There is not one precinct in any state in this country where 100% of the voters are registered to one party.
In a fair election, WEST WOULD HAVE WON. To our everlasting disgrace, the election process has been completely corrupted. Why is it so hard for Americans to see this?
This is a paltry number easily achieved by well-managed fraud.
Sorry, but the truth is Obama beat Romney by approximately 4 million votes nationally. Trying to claim that voter fraud caused us to lose the election is nonsense. Obama got about 3% more of the popular vote than Mitt did. We lost. Period. It would actually be a whole lot more suspicious if Mitt had managed to win those swing states while losing the popular vote by such a margin. Blaming our loss on vote fraud is just refusing to face the truth. The country is changing demographically, socially and on how it views government - and not for the better. We are going to have to face up to that and figure out a serious path forward. Blaming conspiracy theories for our loss gets us nowhere.
Exactly correct kenny, but as this thread shows they really don't get it.
The fraud is easiest if it is a close race. Even if the race is not close a bunch of fake polls can make it look that way. Polling and voting machines are a tyrants dream.