To: fella
Executive orders are subject to judicial review and can be declared unconstitutional. The caveat being that someone has to bring suit in order for that review to occur.
22 posted on
11/17/2012 1:34:05 AM PST by
A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
To: A.A. Cunningham
Executive orders are subject to judicial review and can be declared unconstitutional.
What a naive thought.
Have you looked at the “stacked” Supreme Court lately? Are these the judges you are speaking of?
What part of “the president has the power of kings” don’t you understand?
35 posted on
11/17/2012 4:03:28 AM PST by
DH
(Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
To: A.A. Cunningham
Executive orders are subject to judicial review and can be declared unconstitutional. By the same court that saved Obamacare?
To: A.A. Cunningham
Executive orders are subject to judicial review and can be declared unconstitutional. Not with John Roberts as the Chief Justice they won't be.
90 posted on
11/17/2012 7:02:24 AM PST by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: A.A. Cunningham
Executive orders are subject to judicial review and can be declared unconstitutionalTo quote Justice Thomas, the SCOTUS is "evading" the NBC issue. What makes you think they'll lift a finger to stop anything the usurper does?
91 posted on
11/17/2012 7:04:59 AM PST by
bgill
(We've passed the point of no return. Welcome to Al Amerika.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson