Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: capydick
What is worse is Romney's agreeing to three debates moderated by liberal MSM hosts. The fact that the MSM is liberal is nothing new; Barry Goldwater and Spiro Agnew complained about it 40 or more years ago. If the Republicans had any spine, they would have insisted that half of the debates be moderated by someone like Hannity, Levin, or Limbaugh (not perfect men, but no more biased on their side than Schiefer and Crowley are in the other direction).
31 posted on 11/16/2012 10:25:30 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Wallace T.
"What is worse is Romney's agreeing to 3 debates moderated by liberal MSM"

Yeh, this is getting SO OLD. The repubs need to insist, next time (if there is a "next time") to ONLY attend debates moderated by both sides. One from theirs (MSM), one from ours (Rush, Mark, Sean).

Each side asks one question, then other side gets to ask the next one, and so on.

This would make the debates interesting and informative, instead of the boring "Got ya" sessions they are now.

39 posted on 11/16/2012 4:29:24 PM PST by Pajamajan (Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson