[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Was watching Greta firing off her questions as she does but they always kinda vary....to Bolton she asked...well just what was the CIA doing in Benghazi....no answer from Bolton.

She did not ask that of the Democrat who is the ranking member on the House Intelligence /committee....that would be a classified matter.

I think we will not here much of any answers on that one.

[TigersEye]

I think Greta threw that question in as rhetorical gravy for the full plate of meat and potatoes questions she had just laid out for Bolton. I was watching with my mother and when Greta finished her laundry list I jokingly said "Answer THAT, John!" lol

The questions alone were a stinging indictment.

[Marine_Uncle]

Post 294. RE: "I think we will not here much of any answers on that one."

Your probably right. At least in public hearings one cannot expect for the CIA, DOS, Military, to go into details as to what goes on in a given operation. One can go back to the original Issa public four hour hearing and watch Rep Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) complaining when State Department employee Charlene Lamb had posters pics showing the so called consolate and annex ... the Rep. quickly tried to stop the photos from being displayed and her verbal descriptions as to what the compounds where composed of.

That is just one example of how "touchy" this type of investigation can become, IMHO. What is fair game for public eye consumption. I'm a bit surprise we have gotten so much data into the public eye as is.
I'm as much interested in seeing who screwed the pooch be exposed and then actions (legal by Congressional Constitutional grounds) to go after them.
At the least for the sakes of the four families that now are faced with the realization, their loved ones are in the grave.