Whatever Patreaus said or did not say had nothing to do with the guy who made the “movie” which of cousre no one has ever seen. Only the 14 minute trailor on Youtube which some Egyptian sheikh put up there. The guy who “made” it was partners with a Palestinian jihadist. Neither is clean, and it is obvious that the administration put them up to it. The guy is in jail to keep investigators away from him. He’s probably very stupid and would reveal too much even by accident.
Consider this:
How could the White House/Hildabeast have conjoured the "movie" cannard so quickly....within hours. Since we know now that the movie distraction was just that, and since Obama knew it was a terrorist attack immediately why was there a need for lying? Answer: He did not want the preelection information out. When it went south on him by the early a.m. hours of 9-12 why did they 'settle' on this (of the hundreds of antimuslim videos on Youtube) particular video? The only thing which could answer it is Obama was engaged in doing something (via Stevens) which he did not want the public to know. So they had a backup story ready if events which obama thought he could control, spun out of control....it did. Either the 'Stevens feigned kidnapping for the Blind Sheik' or " 'gunrunning' would explain all of these questions. It is not as simple as Obama wanting the country (US) to warm up to muslims or Ben Ladens al Quaeda was on the run. That would not put the Obama inner sactum into such a lying tailspin. Neither would it cause Obama to sacrifice Rice.....a terrorist attack, so proclaimed would not have cost him a vote. So why the lie about a 14 minute videa? Why would they need a backup plan ready to roll out so completely explaining the incitement to kill? It would have been enough to say we had an attack. But they did not say that. They sold (oversold) the video. Remember Hillary at Dover receiving the bodies. After a collated reading of the dead she spoke more about that 'awful, ugly video, which cause this attack. I told my wife at the time....'she protesteth too much'. If Obama was not doing something he ought not have been doing why the lying distraction of the video.
Now how do we go about proving it with a noncompliant adminsitration. I hope Petraeus comes through..but that will not be enough. We need to speak to those 30 people who the SEALS saved. But if it goes our way tomorrow with Petraeus, he will be labeled an admitted liar, adulterer, who cannot be counted on to even order the saving of the 4 men begging for help from the rooftop in Benghazi. You have to squeeze the correct testicle. Who is the testicle. Well Petraeus is one. Does he have any paperwork which elucidates what happened? Hillary will hold the line unless she is cornered and cannot figure a way out. Panetta is a democrat loyalist...does not give a hoot about the country. We have to speak to the 30 people who the SEALS saved. If Petraeus does not break through I don't see any way to crack the stone wall.