Just the whole story. Hint: It has nothing to do with an illicit affair.
“Hint: It has nothing to do with an illicit affair.”
I’m assuming that this version of events—that Petraeus was pushed out because he was trying to defend CIA, which didn’t exactly square with WH version of Benghazi—is approximately correct. All I’m saying is that if this indeed was the reason for tossing him under the bus, what would motivate WH to attack Broadwell? She supplied them with the perfect innocuous pretext for getting rid of him. Why undercut that rationale by making it appear that she’s a stalker and encouraging the public to be sympathetic towards Petraeus? It’s better for the WH if the public has a “good riddance” attitude towards Petraeus.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2959927/posts