[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

but you still need to be a conservative!

Seems so damned simple and... well... obvious, doesn't it...? ;)

[Jim Robinson]

It was so obvious even a political neophyte like me could see it plain as day. Not one of Rove’s finer picks.

[Yosemitest]

Yes ... it doies seem obvious except to those oblivious "Establishment Repoublicans" and those idiots who aren't paying attention.

We will never unify under "Establishment Republicans" .
"Establishment Republicans" have more in common with the Democrats, than they do with Conservatives.
The weak candidates are "Establishment Republicans", weak on national security, amnesty for illegals, abortion, and government spending.
"Establishment Republicans" scream "COMPROMISE".
And people who study the Bible know that COMPROMISE almost always leads to destruction.
These "Establishment Republicans" are being weeded out, one by one, and slowly but surely, the TEA Party is taking over.

YOU SAY [We're] "Not victims of "the Establishment.""
I disagree.
I ask you again:

Who was it that dumped all those negative adds on Conservative Candidates in the primary?
Who was it that constantly battered each leading Conservative in the primary with an average of three to one negative ads against our real candidates?
Who's money was dumped against the conservative choices?

It WAS Mitt Romney, leader of the "Establishment Republicans"
and it WAS the "Establishment Republicans" who funded all those negative ads against Conservatives.

So conservatives, the BASE of the Republican Party, WERE ' victims of "the Establishment." '

Take a good long look at where "Establishment Republicans" ALWAYS take us.

[Yosemitest]

Sorry.
You DID NOT say " [We're] "Not victims of "the Establishment."""
That was someone else, but the point needs repeating, just not to you.