To: Drango
A house raid for an ‘affair’ seems a wee bit excessive.
8 posted on
11/12/2012 7:22:31 PM PST by
Pikachu_Dad
(Impeach Sen Quinn)
To: Pikachu_Dad
I've seen this movie before
11 posted on
11/12/2012 7:24:00 PM PST by
dfwgator
To: Pikachu_Dad
Nothing is too excessive to protect King Obie Won Can-No-Bodie Touch Me Neener neener boo boo.
So There! :P
24 posted on
11/12/2012 7:33:05 PM PST by
Gasshog
To: Pikachu_Dad
A house raid for an ‘affair’ seems a wee bit excessive.It certainly does. What could they be looking for so avidly -- Obama's birth certificate?
This is, as best I recall of political shenanigans, unprecedented.
To: Pikachu_Dad
A house raid for an ‘affair’ seems a wee bit excessive. You're right on that...
66 posted on
11/12/2012 8:06:39 PM PST by
GOPJ
(Petraeus confession: like something from a 'Soviet purge trial'....)
To: Pikachu_Dad
“A house raid for an ‘affair’ seems a wee bit excessive.”
They’re trying to find classified sex.
70 posted on
11/12/2012 8:13:28 PM PST by
Rebelbase
(The most transparent administration ever is clear as mud.)
To: Pikachu_Dad
A house raid for an ‘affair’ seems a wee bit excessive.
.
.
.
Yes just a little.
To: Pikachu_Dad
A house raid for an ‘affair’ seems a wee bit excessive. Based on comments she made during a lecture, it's plausible that she had access to classified information. Plus, according to the WSJ, classified documents were found on her computer.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson