[palmer]

This is well beyond 6 Sigma

You know that how? These voting machines are extremely easy to use with a final check before pressing ok. The roughly 300 votes per division could all be cast without mistakes for 59 out of 100's of divisions being tested.

[lacrew]

I haven’t completely bought in to the notion that voter fraud alone lost this election for Romney (its always been there, and overcoming it is just part of what a GOP candidate has to face).

However, I do find it astonishing that there weren’t any mistake votes for Romney....considering the adult illiteracy rate in Philadelphia is 22%!

At very least, it suggests that some ‘gatekeeper’ was checking the ballots for mistakes before they were fed into the machine - and who would know whether or not this happened, since the GOP observers were kicked out.

[R0CK3T]

So 17,700 votes for Obama in a row without even a single event of human error? That's one hell of a statistical trend.

What in life can be done 17,700 times without even a single error if not by design?

Processes with this performance are present but they are not so by chance.

AND you KNOW that these people all submitted their votes perfectly 17,700 times in a row without any mistakes at all how?