Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Life After Defeat For Mitt Romney: Public Praise, Private Questions [Recriminations Begin!]
Washington Post ^ | November 07, 2012 | Philip Rucker

Posted on 11/07/2012 10:26:27 PM PST by Steelfish

Life After Defeat For Mitt Romney: Public Praise, Private Questions

By Philip Rucker November 7

BOSTON — Mitt Romney began his retreat from public life Wednesday at a private breakfast gathering with a couple hundred of his most loyal and affluent campaign benefactors. The former Massachusetts governor, humbled by the thumping that ended his six-year pursuit of the presidency, reminisced about the journey and tried not to cry.

Romney waxed about the roaring crowds in the campaign’s closing days and the feeling that he was winning, said donors in attendance. He commended Stuart Stevens, his chief strategist, as well as his senior aides, and then went around thanking donors one by one.

“Mitt was vintage Mitt,” said L.E. Simmons, an oil investor on Romney’s national finance committee. “He was analytical, no notes, spoke from the heart and was very appreciative.”

But Romney’s top aides, who only a couple of days ago were openly speculating about who would fill which jobs in a Romney administration, woke up Wednesday to face brutal recriminations.

Some top donors privately unloaded on Romney’s senior staff, describing it as a junior varsity operation that failed to adequately insulate and defend Romney through a summer of relentless attacks from the Obama campaign over his business career and personal wealth.

“Everybody feels like they were a bunch of well-meaning folks who were, to use a phrase that Governor Romney coined to describe his opponent, way in over their heads,” said one member of the campaign’s national finance committee, who requested anonymity to speak candidly.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: Zhang Fei

You make good points. Even Reagan lost a few times and gained valuable experience as a candidate. He carried heavy duty respect by the time he ran in 1980 .


41 posted on 11/08/2012 12:02:58 AM PST by tartar1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
How DISGUSTING that 0bama has spent his entire term slowly buying votes, THEN IS REWARDED FOR IT:

Gays = Because HE'S ONE and Repeal of DADT too!

Females = Free contraceptives for their Lady Parts / 'War on Women' B.S., and the 'arousal' phenomenon

Babies = They can't vote so KILL THEM.

Blacks = (They'll vote for him NO MATTER WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES!!)

Asians = (No comment)

Hispanics = Overturn Federal Immigration Law (Amnesty)

Youth = "mmmm mmmm mmmmm" (0bama's union teachers hijacked our youth)

Whites ('Honey Boo-Boo' trailer trash variety) = Miscellaneous Entitlements (Brrrrp!)

The great American 'melting pot' has become a jumbled 'tray of sponges'

ATTENTION WHITE MALES: You are irrelevant and/or expendable.

42 posted on 11/08/2012 12:02:58 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

We picked the guy, who couldn’t beat the guy, who didn’t beat the other guy the last time, because the woman is a Christian.


43 posted on 11/08/2012 12:06:52 AM PST by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sockhead
Mitt Romney was not the a conservative candidate of our dreams period

Even Mitt would tell you that depending on the time of day. And he has.

44 posted on 11/08/2012 12:12:01 AM PST by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

Too many “immigrants” are coming in from one culture. That’s far from diverse and most of them are not even “immigrants” because they illegally arrived and Obama signed his executive order and John Boehner did NOTHING.


45 posted on 11/08/2012 12:15:29 AM PST by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Ok, thanks for the info. I stand to be corrected. So, Mitt really didn’t like President Reagan? The best president of my lifetime? Hmmm, I guess those liberal Northeast roots of his go very deep - right into the Democrat pocket.

Oh well, he ran his campaign, gave it his all, and the results are what they are. I believe he would have been a good president and probably have been able to head off the crash that is going to come. I wonder what the takers will do when the well runs dry? Mitt and his family are very gracious, classy people and I would have been proud to call him my president. That doesn’t mean I would have agreed with him on everything, but at least he loves America, something I can’t say about the current squatter in the WH.


46 posted on 11/08/2012 12:16:52 AM PST by Catsrus (WANT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
Latino citizens (natural conservatives) take great offense at their persecution

Hispanics are not "persecuted" in the USA. To the contrary, they are protected as a "minority" group and benefit from affirmative action. And they are NOT "natural" conservatives.

“What Republicans mean by ‘family values’ and what Hispanics mean are two completely different things,” he said. “We are a very compassionate people, we care about other people and understand that government has a role to play in helping people.” And a strong reason for that support for big government is that so many Hispanics use government programs. U.S.-born Hispanic households in California use welfare programs at twice the rate of native-born non-Hispanic households.

A majority of Hispanics now support gay marriage, a Pew Research Center poll from last month found. The Hispanic out-of-wedlock birth rate is 53 percent, about twice that of whites.

47 posted on 11/08/2012 12:17:04 AM PST by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
I overlooked 0bamacare. That was a 'catch all' but captured the hearts of illegal alien would-be voters. If you analyze 0bama's first term, you start to see that every move he made was 'campaign driven' to buy votes for the 2012 election. War on Terror? That doesn't get many votes!

0bama literally started campaigning for his re-election since the day he took office. Being president of the United States of America was just an afterthought. His focus on 0bamacare while jobs tanked was all about the 2012 election. He worked on providing health insurance BECAUSE of his tandem mission to willfully kill off the private sector in the United States, thus forcing more onto entitlements ensuring their vote. Sinister plot.

48 posted on 11/08/2012 12:17:59 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lib-Lickers 2
Ronald Reagan wouldn’t have beaten Obama yesterday.

I disagree. I don't know how old you are -- but if you are under 40 you don't know Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan was NOT afraid of the media. Sam Donaldson was just as liberal as the ones out there today, and Reagan handled him with no problem. Romney lacked the killer instinct. That's why he didn't win.He should have at the very least done interviews on the conservative media. P.S. Sorry about getting upset, especially if you are OVER 40 -- but I got very upset with the author of a thread last night titled "Obama is the new Ronald Reagan." I wrote to the lib author and he wrote back, admitting he only remembered Reagan "imperfectly." Ronald Reagan won 49 states in 1984. So please don't tell me Obama could have beaten him.
49 posted on 11/08/2012 12:21:57 AM PST by malkee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
The GOP stiff-armed it's most energetic group, Ron Paul voters and Evangelicals.

It won't survive as a management Party.

50 posted on 11/08/2012 12:27:14 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

I forget that some people don’t know this stuff, Mitt reregistered republican in October of 1993.

Romney had to give up his hope of running for reelection as governor, and left that office with 34% approval, not normally the thing that makes a party want to make you president.

Mitt Romney, was the anti-Reagan. He also spent five years trying to convince people that Reagan had been “adamantly pro-choice” in an effort to explain away his own pro-abortion positions.

“I think Bill Weld comes as close as anyone,” Romney said when asked whom in his party he aligned with.

“I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush,”

“I’m not a partisan politician. My hope is that, after this election, it will be the moderates of both parties who will control the Senate, not the Jesse Helmses.”


51 posted on 11/08/2012 12:28:09 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney not only reelected Obama, he lost the Senate,ruined the "down ticket", West, Mia Love, Brown.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: malkee; Lib-Lickers 2

Yes! A bit how Gingrich did it except for one thing. Gingrich appeared to be angry (a liberal may also claim he acted “mean”) but Reagan could do it and turn it into a humorous event that just happened.

Groucho Marx and William Buckley

http://youtu.be/EV8516duLVM


52 posted on 11/08/2012 12:28:47 AM PST by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Bush ran against the two very weak Democrats that ever ran,and barely beat them!

Rove is greatly overrated.

53 posted on 11/08/2012 12:30:10 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss; Elsie; All
Carter won 83% of blacks, Obama 93%. Hispanics were only 2% of the population in 1980. Reagan could not be elected governor of California with today's demographics. And that's not a knock on his political skills.

We tried pointing out -- over and over again for 4+ years -- that picking somebody like Romney to run in this multi-cultural environment vs. Obama -- was ludicrous and would result in a loss.

Yeah, Obama "had" the minority vote...but Romney didn't need to even split it to win...

Instead, the GoP establishment picks somebody who at age 31, belonged to a church where if you were black, you couldn't get married in their temple...Or be a member of their priesthood -- somebody they gave/(& still give) to 12 yo white boys.

This lack of "cultural vision" inevitably played out on this turf -- if only even sub-consciously in many voters' minds...

54 posted on 11/08/2012 12:34:54 AM PST by Colofornian (Some say "we're not voting 4 'pastor-in-chief'" --as if "gods-in-embryo" were divine only on Sundays)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

That was entertaining. I love Groucho in Duck Soup, but don’t think I’ve ever seen him interviewed before.


55 posted on 11/08/2012 12:35:02 AM PST by malkee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Great clip, thanks for posting it. Groucho is so funny. I had no idea of his political views.


56 posted on 11/08/2012 12:37:17 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: malkee

I actually worked on a senatorial campaign in 1980(a college semester credited project) and I can tell you Jimmy Carter couldn’t inspire a cat to walk out of a paper bag... pretty much any other of the top Republcans who ran for the nomination including George HW Bush in 1980 would have beaten Carter in 1980.. all it took was a decent showing in a debate and Carter was done.. Romney (of 2012) would have destroyed Carter too.... 53% of the electorate were not ready to toss out Obama yesterday no matter who would have run against him..


57 posted on 11/08/2012 12:40:09 AM PST by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
One reason why it bothered me that McCain picked Palin. She’d be a better candidate today if she was ‘allowed’ to quietly finish her term and get re-elected.

If McCain/Palin total vote-tally was greater than R/R's, could it have been due to the womens' vote? (...and turnout...)?

58 posted on 11/08/2012 12:42:17 AM PST by Does so (....... Justice Scalia just turned 78 .........==8-O ............Dims don't think ... they PLOT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lib-Lickers 2

Whatever. Like I said, he won 49 states in 1984. I don’t GHWB could have done that. And maybe Romney would have beaten Carter. But that still doesn’t make Obama Reagan. Let’s see how his second term goes, and then we can start comparing him to Reagan. It’s not going to happen.


59 posted on 11/08/2012 12:43:50 AM PST by malkee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
Instead, the GoP establishment picks somebody who at age 31, belonged to a church where if you were black, you couldn't get married in their temple...Or be a member of their priesthood -- somebody they gave/(& still give) to 12 yo white boys.

My own sense is that Romney's Mormonism had a negligible effect on the election.

Obama's voters vote for reasons of tribalism, government dependency and cultural brainwashing.

I would bet most Obama voters didn't even know that Romney was a Mormon, or even what a Mormon is.

Heck, I think they would be doing well if even 50% of Obama's voters could even correctly name his own running mate if asked. I bet most could not name the senators of their own state. And I bet most could not name their own congressman.

60 posted on 11/08/2012 12:44:36 AM PST by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson