Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: Don't Lose Heart
http://www.facebook.com ^ | November 7, 2012 | Sarah Palin

Posted on 11/07/2012 9:05:05 AM PST by NKP_Vet

America, don’t lose heart. This election is not an “Obama mandate,” nor is it a rejection of conservatism. Unanswered ads like this one running in blue collar swing states defined Romney early on, and the Obama media also piled on with the narrative that Romney would harm the middle class. (As I personally have witnessed, once a bell is rung by a biased media, it’s impossible to un-ring it.) Ironically, it’s Obama’s socialist policies that will destroy America’s working class as he outsources opportunities.

Hang in there, America. Fight for what is right. Don’t look to government or any politician to solve your problems. Government can’t make you happy, healthy, wealthy or wise. Obama is a master at reading the right “soaring” words fed into his teleprompter, but actions speak louder than words. So, hold tight to 2 Corinthians 4:8 because we’re in for a wild ride.

We must survive. United. One nation under God.

"We are hard-pressed on every side, yet not crushed; we are perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted but not forsaken, struck down, but not destroyed." – 2 Corinthians 4:8-9.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: palin; palinsarahpalin; sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Biblebelter

Don’t look to those Pubbie elitists to offer a candidate to represent you and give this nation the leadership it so desperately needs when that elitist Romney could not find a place for Sarah to speak at the Pubbie elite convention although he allowed that treacherous fat boy to give the keynote.


One of the very few things I find good about this mess is that Mitt like his father is now a politician to ignore from now on.

Also he was very good at destroying any conservative in the primaries but just couldn’t rise to the occasion when dealing with the “won”. And now his confederates and “hitmen” are now known and should be shunned by whoever becomes the next candidate for President.


41 posted on 11/07/2012 10:08:20 AM PST by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

None of it makes sense. How do we go from a 2010 red tide wave... just 2 years ago, to a complete and total rejection of every core principle republicans stand for? It just makes NO sense.


42 posted on 11/07/2012 10:09:04 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Newt

no eye of newt I would NOT have said it durign htose time periods- those were much much much different times- We are now witnessing this country change right before our eyes for he worse- rapidly! The left is unleashed now- Even when clinton was president, as bad aqs that was, it was NOWHERE NEAR as bad as thigns are today thanks to a many in this country who are too guillible to know the truth when they see it- When Reagan and our foundign fathers were around, there was real reason for hope- now there is real reason for fear- We are goign to have 2 liberals elected to the supreme court and that will be the completion of the undoing of America as we know it- We are watchign drugs beign legalized all across America now, we are watchign gay marriage be3coem hte norm, we are watchign our constitutional rights beign eroded swiftly and without opposition, we are watchign illegal aliens becoming a majority, we are watchign Christianity more andm ore becoem unacceptable in public places- now- none of htese thigns were happenign back durign hte time periods you referred to and there was true reason to have hope back then, and folsk that rallied others weren’t havign to draw from a dry well in order to try to paint a hopeful picture- but today, it’s a much much different story-


43 posted on 11/07/2012 10:09:49 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Newt

I don’t remember any of them quitting their elected office.


44 posted on 11/07/2012 10:11:07 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PatriotCause
What? Romney ran a good campaign! What are you going to do when plain-clothed ACORN hacks, black panthers and union thugs are running the polls and counting the votes? Do you REALLY believe that fewer Republicans came out to vote for Romney than did for McCain in 2008?

There IS one thing 0bama has been working on for over 3 years; STEALING THIS ELECTION by suppressing Romney votes! Add to that the fact 55% of females voted for 0bama simply because he's 'charming' without ANY regard or respect for four dead Americans ABANDONED TO DIE by 0bama in Benghazi, HIGHER unemployment than when he took office, high gas and food prices, increased food stamp and disability recipients, worsening foreign policy and aiding and abetting TERRORISTS, lowering of personal income, etc, etc..

If we were SCREWED in 2008, we were F**KED in 2012. It's over, folks. No bright side to this. Only one thing can fix this and it ain't pretty. But today's American would rather surrender than fight. Emasculation and TOLERANCE OF THE UNACCEPTABLE has overcome us all. Goodbye, America.

45 posted on 11/07/2012 10:13:42 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rintense

Yesterday does not make any sense at all. Obama got 10 million less votes than 2008. If we had done slightly better than McCain we would have won. How did we lose voters? Something is rotten here...


46 posted on 11/07/2012 10:14:05 AM PST by Revelation Concepts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

To those who deem it necessary to dump on Sarah Palin on this thread; You are just as stupid as those who voted for Obama.


47 posted on 11/07/2012 10:16:45 AM PST by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense

[[None of it makes sense. How do we go from a 2010 red tide wave... just 2 years ago, to a complete and total rejection of every core principle republicans stand for? It just makes NO sense.]]

The only thing I can figure is that God is judging htis nation because we have kicked Him out of our nation and turned our backs on His people- EVERYTHING happened ‘just right’ to set up dear leader’s reelection- there was a very very slight ‘improvement’ in the jobs market and hte people went week-kneed thinking hteir false messiah was the reason for the ‘improvement’ and they beleived we were now ‘on the right track thanks to dear leader ‘bailing us out of a republican mess’ (Yet this same public woudl have screamign for impeachment IF a republican was in office and the unemplyment were STILL HIGHER THAN when he or she took office- but because obama is a liberal ,and is black, the media and public dare not hold him accouintable for ANYTHING! Even when he goes to sleep while 4 Americans were beign murdered by terrorists and were begging for help)

Then the storm hit, and dear leader got to ‘appear presidential’ (even htough he hasn’t doen a damn thing to get relief to these peopel even still)

Then the GOP’s rockstar Christie was seen schmoozing with dear leader and the independents WERE swayed by that despicable act

These were all orchestrated to ensure reelction because htis country has forsaken the very God that made it great to begin with- all these events were out of our power- and it is what it is- We need to face the fact that we ARE beign judged as a nation- it’s pretty plain to see-


48 posted on 11/07/2012 10:23:10 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

FUSP - You did nothing to help matters.


49 posted on 11/07/2012 10:26:50 AM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

Funny how the RINO worshipers were so adamant about Palin staying away to avoid getting her “damaged brand” all over Romney.

Now, it’s all her fault for not doing more.

Let’s blame everyone except who’s really at fault, shall we? It’s a lesson we’ve learned well from Obama, if so.


50 posted on 11/07/2012 10:31:31 AM PST by kevkrom (If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion. --Psalm 137:1
51 posted on 11/07/2012 10:36:11 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Hey, Sarah. We need players, not cheerleaders. Where were you the last couple of months?

Sod off.


52 posted on 11/07/2012 10:39:38 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevestras

For the most part, I agree with you, but I do take Sarah Palin - and her family - to task for their fawning over DWTS. Seriously...I’d expect a lot more Stateswoman-like behavnior out of Palin, especially given her supposed care about the future of the country. It’s called leading by example, and IMHO, THAT is no example to be leading by. Just my - albeit minor - 2cents worth.


53 posted on 11/07/2012 10:42:31 AM PST by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Sarah could have run and won because the women vote went heavily for Obama . The media painted Romney as a woman hater. What say you Sarah? We needed you, duty called and ...


54 posted on 11/07/2012 10:47:27 AM PST by Democrat_media (limit government to 5000 words of laws. how to limit gov Quantify limited government ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chimera

I concur, we are done as a republic. Working from within is no longer a viable option. The question is how long before the wheels fall off and as you ask what will replace it another republic or tyranny. Tyranny usually wins that fight.

All I can do is try and prepare my children for the dark future that awaits them when the train wreck happens. I feel like Charlton Heston at the end of The Planet of the Apes when he sees the remnants of the Statue of Liberty and laments: “You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! damn you all to hell!”


55 posted on 11/07/2012 10:49:59 AM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

She’s right about the media. We must think of new ways to subvert the MSM.

Any ideas?


56 posted on 11/07/2012 10:51:46 AM PST by miserare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man
but when it came to the gen he was very good at destroying any conservative in the primaries but just couldn’t rise to the occasion when dealing with the “won”.

That is keen observation, that I would like to expand upon.

Bob Dole, Juan McCain, and Mittens Romney were each the hand picked choice of the pubbie elite and very weak candidates running against candidates that were very vulnerable.

Dole and McCain in particular were no cowards on the field of battle and each guy had no problem going on the attack in the primary, but in the general election that were appeared to be cowards to go on the attack.

Of course, Mittens had no military service record, his service record was in missionary service in which he went out pestering people with the Book of Mormon. But as you pointed out Mittens was had no qualms with bringing Bob Dole out of the nursing home to attack Newt in a trumped up paper interview if not one in the flesh.

Romney's defining moment as a candidate was the third debate. He was unwilling to attack Barry with the truth of Benghazi when Barry had attacked him with every lie in the book.

Mittens was an idiot just like Dole and McCain because they listened to the liars in the MSM who say that women voters do not like negative attacks.

Once again that is a lie, Barry ran what probably is the most unfair, dishonest and negative attack campaign in American history and women seemed to be all right with that.

Mittens played it safe because he believed the all the conservative know nothing commentators who said he had a lead and played it safe.

Mittens was not man enough to be president, you cannot reserve your strongest attacks for Newt Gingrich your primary opponent, get pummeled with lie after lie in the general election, and then have the truth of Benghazi handed to you on a silver plate and refuse to use it.

57 posted on 11/07/2012 10:51:54 AM PST by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
Females didn’t vote for 0bama over any issues.

You might be right with regards to Obama, but women gave their support to Kuster, Hassan, and Shea-Porter last night for one major reason...'reproductive rights'. Maybe NH should replace the 'Old Man of the Mountain' state symbol with an aborted fetus.

58 posted on 11/07/2012 10:53:00 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter
I called it but a lot ridiculed me. I said Gallup faked that 52 - 46 Romney lead to get Rommney to play it safe in the debates and campaign to play ahead with a prevent defense.

Notice how gallup had it even at the end.

59 posted on 11/07/2012 11:02:19 AM PST by Democrat_media (limit government to 5000 words of laws. how to limit gov Quantify limited government ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media
I believe you were right because the only poll that should be trusted is the one taken at the ballot box.

However, even if he had been ahead, it was bad strategy, because sitting on a lead and trying to run the clock does not work any better in politics than it does in sports. Winners are competitive and they play the game out full tilt until the clock reads triple zeroes.

60 posted on 11/07/2012 11:51:30 AM PST by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson