Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fabian

I preferred Gingrich to Romney as well. We all know Newt would of pounded President Obama with Benghazi night and day until the election. There would have been no letup through all three debates. On the flip side don’t you think the gender gap might have been even worse with Newt?


101 posted on 11/07/2012 7:03:27 AM PST by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: dowcaet
We care about Benghazi. Practically no one else does.

Newt could've tattooed "Benghazi" on his forehead, and folks would've said, "who's Ben?"

106 posted on 11/07/2012 7:08:30 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: dowcaet

Yes, Gingrich could HAVE pounded obama night and day on Benghazi, but with the liberal controlled media nobody would have known about it.


141 posted on 11/07/2012 8:24:46 AM PST by bluerose ("Equal opportunity, not equal outcome" ~Paul Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: dowcaet

I doubt it because many women especially needed to see fire and instead got mister nice guy with Romney.


225 posted on 11/07/2012 4:47:46 PM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter"you min)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: dowcaet

I doubt it because many women especially needed to see fire and instead got mister nice guy with Romney.


226 posted on 11/07/2012 4:48:10 PM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter"you min)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson