Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Not really looking to play shoulda, woulda, coukda here but I will anyway.

If Rep and Conservatives across the board had followed the Reagan doctrine of speaking no ill towards our Party and would have backed the Party’s chosen candidate after the primaries there is no doubt in my mind the outcome would have been different.

To believe LESS people turned out this cycle vs 2008 still stuns me given all we now know about this president. So to all of you “purists” who simply couldn’t bring yourselves to vote for a man who by your non action as much as said he is actually WORSE than the disaster currently in the WH, you will assume the full responsibility for what if anything of a calamitous nature awaits us down the road.

Frankly I am both nauseated and totally repelled by your selfish actions


93 posted on 11/07/2012 4:37:26 AM PST by Lacey2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lacey2

If you will read again the opening of this piece, I clearly state that I DID put my X next to Romney’s name.

I did it because of Benghazi. I couldn’t imagine anyone being worse than Obama on that.

Then Romney backed off, disengaged, and never took up the gauntlet that had been delivered to him on a silver platter.

That had nothing at all to do with inter-republican rivalries.

It had to do with either his:

1. Resolve

2. Strategy

3. or both

He went tepid on us. With the bank collapese, McCain rolled over. With Benghazi, Romney timidly began playing prevent defense.


102 posted on 11/07/2012 4:47:16 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson