Ma's vote was the deciding factor first time around for Obi-Care.
She will back Barrack on his plan to implement major new anti-gun legislation.
I would actually support Dine over Ma McCaskill were he the only other choice. But he has absolutely no chance of winning. The Libertarian candidate in 2006 got approx. 47K votes out of 2 million plus votes cast.
The reality of the situation is there are 2 candidates running with any chance of victory. Akin is the only choice for conservatives. RKBA types. etc.etc. McCaskill is the antithesis of all things conservative...
Ma's vote was the deciding factor first time around for Obi-Care.I don't recall where she landed in to queue, but the final hold-out Democrat was Ben Nelson. Remember the "Conhusker Kickback" he secured in exchange for his vote?
I would actually support Dine over Ma McCaskill were he the only other choice. But he has absolutely no chance of winning.If you're going to cast your vote based on who has the best chance of winning, then vote for Obama because the polls are giving him the edge. No, sometimes you have to cast your vote based on who you believe represents you best.
McCaskill is the antithesis of all things conservative...I could argue that Romney is worse than McCaskill in that respect and we all voted for him (I hope). I think Romney will have better economic policies than Obama, but I don't expect him to stand up for conservative values. He hasn't before.