Posted on 11/04/2012 7:35:15 PM PST by shoedog
I just got back from the rally today in PA, they told us we broke 30,000 that Ohio had yesterday (I heard 34,000 but I can’t confirm).
Bush had a rally in 2004 at the same location, and it was tiny in comparison to this. It was a sea of people out there.
Romney’s performing the best in the suburbs of Philadelphia since 1988, I’m certain. If Pennsylvania is a swing state, then it’ll go for Romney this time.
If not, I don’t know how the GOP can ever pick up PA.
An enormous rally for Mitt Romney in Bucks County, PA had people incredulous and tweeting like fury:
http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=156074
Do you know what 4 towns Clinton is visiting????
didn’t here sites just say a couple tweets (by both Dem and Rep) tweeters that said he had four stops.
I’d be surprised if Intercourse, PA isn’t on his list.
I am very happy with where we sit in this election. I think everyone is misreading this thing, and that PA will be the one that wins it for us.
I breathed a sigh of relief when Dick Morris failed to back down on his prediction on Gretta. In fact, he added MN to the Romney column!
It’s not just Morris either. Now Barone and Will think we’re going to see a decisive victory.
When the only person predicting a decisive victory for the Oblammo campaign is... *snigger*... Paul Krugman, you know there is a problem.
I agree Happy with Will who doesn’t go out on limbs, Morris, glad but don’t take him as serious but the one that I totally believe in is Barone, he has forgotten more about districts/voter patterns etcc/ than any one else out there period. While he is a Republican, he is a realist. For him to make the call makes me feel very good! Again, lots of non scientific data with crowds, momentum, signs, conversations with past Obama voters, feels like 2008 in reverse.
If willin' Willie is tag teaming with Pee Wee Herman they need to come to Bird-in-hand.
Like Intercourse, found in Leacock Township.
That's pronounced "LAY-cock", for those of you in Rio Linda.
Pennsylvania’s Tribune-Democrat: “ROMNEY Can Right Listing Ship”
Just saw this on twitter..even a Democrat paper in PA is endorsing Romney
Obama will win Philadelphia county. He is likely to win Lakawanna county. Delaware, Montomery and Allegheny counties are toss ups. What is very notable is Allegheny (Pittsburgh), it is literally a dead heat there. Romney will win at least 62 counties, and in many of those counties Romney will get between 65 to 75% of the vote.
There is no early voting, but absentee ballots are in. Romney is up 19% in absentee voting.
While all of this sounds encouraging, you have to realize that over 550k will be voting for Obama in Philadelphia. If turn out is low in Philadelphia, 560k and below, then Romney will win. Obama has to get the vote out in Philadelphia. The machine in Philly is a machine. 83% will vote for Obama.
It is very difficult for all the small red counties in Pa to make up for the Philadelphia vote. A big help would be winning Bucks, Montomery and Delaware counties. I think Bucks will go for Romney. We’ll see about the other two.
I’m curious what you guys think about my take on this.
It would seem to me that Clinton would only serve to remind them of how badly 0 is doing.
Am I off base here, or are the dems in bad enough shape that they have no choice but to take that risk?
I just love to start trouble.
;D
Or Climax which is just down the road.
Just out of curiosity, Freepers, how effective could Clinton, or anyone be—the day before the election? It’s a Monday...kids in school, working people at work...I guess the unemployed could go watch Clinton. Surely, all the undecideds have made up their minds, right?
hahaha, I’m sure there’ll be plenty of that! He ain’t doing this for free!
Maybe Pennsylvanians love Clinton, however, he isn’t on the ballot this year and with this boondoggle of a thing in Benghazi hanging over his wife’s head, I’m just not so sure he is a winning strategy. Just my point of view, of course.
This is precisely why I have favored having Romney as the nominee since W. barely eked out an electoral majority in his reelection campaign in 2004. The 2012 Republican Romney/Ryan ticket is the mirror image of the 1992 Democrat Clinton/Gore ticket. The purpose of having two northerners on the Republican ticket this year is the same as having two southerners on the 1992 Democratic ticket. It's to double down on appeal to a region in which the party has been week in recent elections.
Look at the 2000, 2004, and 2008 electoral maps. Some Great Lakes/midwestern states were just out of reach. I figured Romney was the right candidate to pick off Colorado, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire. Guess where the swing states are this year.
This is precisely why I have favored having Romney as the nominee since W. barely eked out an electoral majority in his reelection campaign in 2004. The 2012 Republican Romney/Ryan ticket is the mirror image of the 1992 Democrat Clinton/Gore ticket. The purpose of having two northerners on the Republican ticket this year is the same as having two southerners on the 1992 Democratic ticket. It's to double down on appeal to a region in which the party has been week in recent elections.
Look at the 2000, 2004, and 2008 electoral maps. Some Great Lakes/midwestern states were just out of reach. I figured Romney was the right candidate to pick off Colorado, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire. Guess where the swing states are this year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.