Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/04/2012 7:11:01 AM PST by Arec Barrwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Arec Barrwin

Also missing in the MSM reporting is how many dems who voted early voted for Romney....

My guess is lots and lots did...


2 posted on 11/04/2012 7:16:11 AM PST by Popman (November 7th...will be a good day for America..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin

Huge increases in early voting only matter if it affects the final vote tally. That’s the question: would these early voters NOT have voted on election day?

I’m certain Romney is going to win big, but I could care less about who decides to get in line first to vote.


3 posted on 11/04/2012 7:17:16 AM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin

Very good analysis. Another would be to take the counties won by kerry/obama and compare to bush/mccain counties. Swing counties would be bush/obama counties. Their increase may indicate increased republican enthusiasm not necessarily democratic.

Another point to keep in mind. That’s what wasserman has been doing in VA for cook political.


4 posted on 11/04/2012 7:17:16 AM PST by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin; SeekAndFind; LS; Perdogg; napscoordinator; God luvs America; nutmeg; SoFloFreeper; ...

Time for people to ‘buck up’ and stay strong!!!


5 posted on 11/04/2012 7:18:05 AM PST by Perdogg (Vote like the US Constitution depends on it - it does!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin

Missing from the analysis will be the fact that, there are a lot of democrats with a lot of time on their hands, and so, have a lot more free time to go vote, while, republicans are busy earning a living, and won’t have as much time to head to the early election sites.


6 posted on 11/04/2012 7:20:38 AM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin

Similar in dynamic in Nevada.


8 posted on 11/04/2012 7:24:22 AM PST by HannibalHamlinJr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin

That’s even before people get to the polls Tuesday.

Nothing indicates O’s Campaign is in good shape.

The polls only conceal the state of its collapse. People have no clue as to what’s going on.


9 posted on 11/04/2012 7:24:31 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin

Bill Cunningham on Hannity 11/2/2012 (Romney will win Ohio and Wisconsin)

http://barracudabrigade.blogspot.com/2012/11/obamas-katrina-bill-cunningham-with.html


10 posted on 11/04/2012 7:30:16 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather (Yuri Bezmenov (KGB Defector) - "Kick The Communists Out of Your Govt. & Don't Accept Their Goodies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin
4. But look at the Republican counties. They are little by themselves but they add up.

Last night Michael Barone on "Huckabee" said that the increased 2012 turnout in small Republican counties would allow Romney to win Ohio.

11 posted on 11/04/2012 7:31:37 AM PST by matt1234 (As Obama sowed in the Arab Spring, so he is reaping in the Arab Fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin
I wonder if the gains in Republican counties is the result of the Romney ground game, or is it simply people are fed up and are voting.

There is no early voting in PA, and where I live there isn't a Romney ground game. I live in a Republican county, that went for McCain in 2008, but a lot of Republicans voted for Obama and some stayed home. From what I have observed, the lost Republican vote is coming home. County wide, this probably amounts to 5 to 6 thousand votes going to Romney that McCain didn't get in 2008. If that repeats itself for other 60 Republican counties in PA, Romney is going to win. (BTW, PA is a red state on the county level. There are only 7 or so really Democratic counties in the state)

13 posted on 11/04/2012 7:38:30 AM PST by ConservativeInPA (I advocate indentured servitude for the 47% until the national debt is eliminated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin

FWIW. Here’s a local article (Portage co. OH) which went to Obama in 08 (54-46). I believe the Repub uptick is due to the hard work of our local Teaparty group. We are very organized and relentless. All polling stations will have members present on election day from open to close. I’m scheduled for the morning, will check in and give updates. My instincts are telling me Portage is going to Romney.

GOP surge surpasses Dems on Portage voter rolls
By Mike Sever | staff writer/Record Courier

Portage County’s majority political organization is now the Republican Party although far more voters remain unaffiliated with eithe GOP or the Democrats, according to voter registration statistics from the county board of elections.

As of Monday, Oct. 22, registration totaled 108,287 voters, a 4,540 increase from the spring primary election.

That total was split among 14,206 registered Republicans and 9,973 Democrats. That’s a 5,864 voter increase for the GOP and a 1,612 drop for Democrats from the primary.

The number of voters who declared no party affiliation was 84,043, a minimal 223 registration increase from the primary.

The numbers will change by Election Day, according to Faith Lyon, director of the Portage County Board of Elections. The local board is still processing registration info it receives from the Secretary of State in Columbus. Workers also are verifying the status of people who filed changes of address and making sure voters do not have duplicate registrations, Lyon said.
http://www.recordpub.com/news/article/5225009


15 posted on 11/04/2012 7:46:16 AM PST by Gorilla44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin
Cuyahoga is at 95% of 2008 totals"

Yeah; as usual, the Dem's in Cuyahoga have voted early, and MANY will vote again at the Polls on Tuesday, for The Messiah....count on it.

17 posted on 11/04/2012 7:50:15 AM PST by traditional1 (Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin

Let me spell out the (obvious) case why Romney will trounce Obama in Ohio:
1) Obama won Ohio in 2008 by 4.5%. McCain was a terrible, under-funded candidate; Obama was fresh, unknown, and NOT Bush. Four years later, Obama is a known quantity with a bad economic record and a ton of baggage. He obviously is in worse political shape than 2008.
2) Every state that borders Ohio is either overwhelmingly for Romney/Ryan, or is obviously moving in that direction. West Va. dems voted 43% for a FELON in the dem primary in May. Kentucky dems voted 41% “uncommitted” instead of for Obama. Obama won Indiana by a point in 2008; he will lose by 15 to 20 points this year. And now credible polls are showing that Romney is within strking distance in Pa. and Mich. Does anyone reasonably believe that the Ohio border somehow magically seals off the discontent for Obama in bordering states? I don’t think so.
3) The biggest myth about Obama’s 2008 win was that there was this massive turnout for dems. Not so. In fact, Obama rec’d far less votes than John Kerry. There was a precipitous drop-off of working-class white dems in Ohio, and an even bigger drop-off of Republicans and evangelicals. Does anyone reasonably expect that blue collar white dems are going to come roaring out for Obama in 2012. Hell no. He never had these John Kerry-democrats, and he never will get them. Obama’s big problem is that blacks, students, young people, etc. won’t post, which is what we are seeing in the early vote numbers.
4) Obama is weaker with every demographic. He will lose a small percentage of jewish votes around Cleveland and Cincinnat; his gay marriage stance will cost him a small sliver of black votes; conservative Catholics in Southern Ohio are ticked off about the contraception mandate. Please, someone out there name me one demographic group that Obama is doing better with in 2012? White, female reporters who work for MSNBC?
5) Ohio is a Republican state. Republican candidates in Ohio always outperform the national polls by 2 to 3 percent.
6) I’m from Cincinnati, but in I live in the DC suburbs. Obama is playing non-stop abortion and gay rights ads on Northern Virginia radio. His campaign obviously sees that turnout among the young dingbats is dicey. Imagine what we would be thinking if Romney were running pro-life and pro-gun ads in the week before the election.

So, please, everyone stop worrying about Ohio. Just get out and vote.


18 posted on 11/04/2012 7:51:00 AM PST by bort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin; Ravi; SoftwareEngineer
Have been having a running argument with long-time county chairman and GOP insider based in Columbus who claims that new OH law says that if you did not vote in 2012 primary, you lost your D/R designation and became "unaffiliated." Ohio SoS office said the opposite, that you retain for six years, but this fellow replied "Did you talk to Husted? I did." Well, no. with all my "prestige" (lol) I can't just get the SoS on the line.

But I can run an analysis, and did so on absentees only (not early votes). I can't post because of formatting. If someone can post a Word document, I'm happy to send you what SoftwareEngineer put some of it in Excel, but only did 10, and this does not include Cuyahoga or Franklin).

Conclusions of my mini-study:

*I looked at the first 27 OH counties alphabetically, which includes Franklin, Clark, and Cuyahoga.

*The hypothesis is that if you automatically lose your party ID because you don't vote in a primary, then a decline of 30,000 Ds from 2008 should be offset by an increase of 30,000 Is in 2012. Didn't happen, except in two cases, Adams and Columbiana. There, large D decreases were matched with large I increases. But in Champaign, Ds lost 71% from 08, but Is only rose 11%. Cuyahoga lost .08% but Is only increased .04%. (Rs gained 30%)

*Franklin Ds fell 30%, but Is fell as well, only at -17%.

In short, it's very hard to find a "swap out" explanation for the D declines in OH.

21 posted on 11/04/2012 7:58:20 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin
I seen u moobie... you wun funi guy.

We know from Barone that obama is having to get his normal reliable Tuesday voters to vote early to try and create an air of some semblance of momentum somewhere to spin. Some of that early vote will be normal Tuesday voters not voting... so the turnout on Tuesday for the dims will be less than predicted. Barone is correct.

LLS

29 posted on 11/04/2012 8:18:09 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (OUR GOVERNMENT AND PRESS ARE NO LONGER TRUSTWORTHY OR DESERVING OF RESPECT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

sfl


33 posted on 11/04/2012 8:22:59 AM PST by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin

I also think that not all of the “Democrats” will be voting for Obama, wheras I think virtually all of the “Republicans” will be voting for Romney (with a small contengent of Ron Paul/libertarian nuttos voting for Gary Johnson)!~


41 posted on 11/04/2012 8:40:57 AM PST by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin

There is another factor in Romney’s favor in states like Ohio - it is the SECRET BALLOT... A fair number of people who are surrounded my die hard Democrats (neighbors, family, friends and coworkers) just do not want to argue, be ridiculed or be castigated by others for doing something common sense like vote AGAINST obama. The Secret Ballot means that others may wonder or even be rude and ask - but one does not have to tell... In this Cable/Satellite TV News, Talk Radio and Internet era... it is neigh on impossible not to be exposed to the truth... Many will never debate others, put up a sign or slap on a bumper sticker... but they vote their conscience in private - Silent Independents.


42 posted on 11/04/2012 8:50:03 AM PST by ICCtheWay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin

If Cuyahoga and Summit are close to 2008 numbers, what does that say to those who told us that Democratic enthusiasm isn’t as strong in 2012 as it was in 2008?

The Rats have thousands of SEIU, NEA union members, ACLU types, NARAL, Planned Parenthood, LGBT and Rainbow Coalition, high school and college kids and by one report even illegals impressed into their ground game with fleet loads of buses taking even the homeless and mentally retarded to the polls. Do the Republican have a ground game to match?


47 posted on 11/04/2012 9:27:03 AM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arec Barrwin
If I'm reading the numbers wrong, please tell me. But it seems that the OH and VA numbers by county tell the tale -- small decreases in the Democratic areas but huge increases in Republican areas.

That is the type of information Barone uses in his predictions. The shifting local demographics.

50 posted on 11/04/2012 9:44:11 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Obama didn't fix it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson