What the White House naïvely bought into IN ADVANCE was a scheme to allow Amb. Stevens to be kidnapped and held for ransom.
Obama and Valerie Jarret desperately wanted to show Obama as the Master Negotiator, a mensch capable of doing what even the Great Jimmy Carter couldn't: successfully redeem hostages from muslims, and just in time for the election.
As an added bonus, it would provide the all the cover needed to release the Blind Sheik and all the "political" prisoners from Gitmo.
I believe Bronco and Val were astonished when the scorpion stung them in mid-river.
That they were so (dare I say it?) UNEXPECTEDLY betrayed caught them so utterly flat-footed that they still haven't come up with a good cover story!
Just one old, tired and cynical guy's opinion, of course.
Cite one demonstrable fact that says it isn't true, if you can...
That general concept of an explanation of the poop-storm that was Benghazi has been rattling around for a month-or-so.
I have no means of disputing any of it, or even of saying “That doesn’t sound right”.
I’ve been thinking (and saying) Jarrett is up to her neck and then some in this disaster. One day the truth will out - I think a charge of ‘treason’ would suit her well.
Network of Evil. Mapping the Islamic Brigades from Benghazi to Syria.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2954345/posts
That’s the most plausible explanation I’ve seen of their reactions to what happened. Makes perfect sense.
Are you old and tired? That’s my kinda guy! ;-)
nope you got it...and since you used the scorpion analogy...all I can say is...’it is the middle east’