Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Numeros

It is interesting that I’ve been using that “old” one to beat up liberals for a month or so now, and it’s technically wrong, but nobody caught it. :-)

Also, it is almost impossible to find on the internet. Link after link points to the “early” report. But to be frank, what votes came in after the fact, can they even be trusted.

ON a side (and comical) note. Limbaugh, about an hour ago, was quoting the very figures we are discussing - from the early document.


79 posted on 10/31/2012 11:33:52 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf

I heard Limbaugh quote from the old Fordham list a couple of weeks ago too.

I also saw Scott Rasmussen on Fox News with Megyn Kelly not long ago. Kelly quoted from the outdated list and said Rasmussen was #1. Scott Rasmussen just nodded his head and smiled.

Another interesting tidbit is that Rasmussen’s website cited the early Fordham report with a link for more than a year - long after the final election numbers came out. But sometime after Fordham released the second report in December 2009, Rasmussen pulled the link and all mention of Fordham.


81 posted on 10/31/2012 1:09:36 PM PDT by Numeros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson