Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Errant
I know you used the word "mark"...as in bookmark...but it didn't make grammatical sense to say that.

Yep...surge is tricky. My forecast was for 11' of water...+/-1'. Ended up 2' higher than my window....and what I said in post 170 was this:

"Winds TS...with gusts to hurricane force on the SW side.
"Surge to 11-12' max if it comes in on high tide.
"Massive power outages due to size of wind field and leaves on the trees making it easier to bring them down.
"Will hit with a WNW heading and a pressure around 945-950.
"Will cause 15-20 billion in damage."

Damage estimate was too low. This will be much more. I also said this:

"This storm is coming ashore somewhere along Jersey...possibly as far south as N DE coast...and as far north as NYC...but probably near ACY. This creates the worst possible funneling affect down Long Island Sound."

So...won't hang my head in shame on this forecast...

578 posted on 10/29/2012 8:53:20 PM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies ]


To: NELSON111
NP, This extra water is going to create issues with fires and the FD unable to get to them. Same as we had in N.O.

They finally resorted to using helicopters and "bambi" buckets. Let's pray this doesn't happen here with all the high rise buildings. Talk about a disaster!

585 posted on 10/29/2012 9:01:33 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies ]

To: NELSON111
" Damage estimate was too low "

Just like the skewed unemployment numbers a few weeks ago ?

Of course ? the MSM will try to hide the damage estimate as long as possible if they think it's going to hurt Obama's re-election chances some how.

Damage estimates ? " will be released AFTER the election "
592 posted on 10/29/2012 9:05:46 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies ]

To: NELSON111

I live in northern CT. Our local weather forecasts made it seem like the issues in NJ and NY along the shore would be more prevalent inland. As far as I can tell from the scanner, mostly tree damage to utilities. No reports of flooding inland or major structural damage etc.

When I saw it was supposed to hit in the southern part of NJ, and the wind direction, I figured the biggest threat would be flooding along the shoreline.


608 posted on 10/29/2012 9:18:34 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies ]

To: NELSON111

Well, you nailed the landfall almost dead on...report I saw said the “official” landfall was 5 miles south of Atlantic City, minimum central pressure 946 mb.

}:-)4


616 posted on 10/29/2012 9:25:05 PM PDT by Moose4 (...and walk away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies ]

To: NELSON111
Your forecast was excellent. As far as the surge in NYC, a lot of folks thought the storm speeding up was good news, when in fact it allowed the circulation around the back side of the eye to make high tide even worse.

I still have power, but my office does not.

I wonder if the folks who were belittling this storm will have enough character to admit they were wrong. I see one has on this thread. But I doubt the most strident will.

749 posted on 10/30/2012 5:14:09 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson