Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nuconvert

Then who directed General Ham to not deploy those assets?


3 posted on 10/29/2012 5:24:20 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Re-distribute my work ethic, not my wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Arm_Bears

I believe that turned out to be a rumor.


4 posted on 10/29/2012 5:25:51 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arm_Bears

Does anyone at his level or below have the authority to act?


5 posted on 10/29/2012 5:25:55 AM PDT by Frapster (There you go again....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arm_Bears

My bet is NO ONE DID. He requested it, and was told to stand by , stand by , stand by.... soon he made the judgement that it would be dereliction of duty not to act, he did and was immediately relieved of command for it. As soon as it is revealed he was relieved of command for acting in the absence of orders. Obama is done for. It will show that Obama acted to fire a general in the time of crisis for taking action in the best interest in america and Obama was acting in the best interest of his campaign.


14 posted on 10/29/2012 5:50:21 AM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson